Sadiq Khan

By the way G I have never ever used bolded text. The o ly bolded text you’ve seen me post is from your pasted posts. Lol. Hilarious
 
Sponsored Links
The London mayor that has professionally defended Islamic terrorists & hate preachers who wanted to spout their poison in this country. Nice.
That's what lawyers do, it's in their job descriptions. They don't get to pick and choose their clients. Well some do. But usually Human Rights lawyers are obliged to defend all sorts of people who's Human Rights may not be respected.
Even terrorists are entitled to a defence lawyer.
 
Would you believe Keir Starmer. I’ll show you anyway. Weirdo.
48B58E7A-DB29-4B1D-9057-DB37C7EAE2E7.png
 
Prove what I’ve said is not true

Can’t prove I’m wrong then . Lol.

Can’t prove I’m wrong then . Lol.
It's not possible to prove a negative.
Many times silly posters have made a false claim, then challenged anyone to prove them wrong.
YOU CAN'T PROVE A NEGATIVE!
Russell's Teapot.
Russell's teapot is an analogy, formulated by the philosopher Bertrand Russell (1872–1970), to illustrate that the philosophic burden of proof lies upon a person making unfalsifiable claims, rather than shifting the burden of disproof to others.​
 
Sponsored Links
Any good for you G or would you like to see the pope stating it??? Lol
 
G, DJ? Hello, is this evidence good enough?
I don't think it's disputed that Sadiq Khan professionally defended some terrorist from being deported to USA.
That's what Human Rights lawyers do.
It means that they are professionals in their trade. It does not mean that they are terrorists, nor that they philosophically agree with terrorism.
If it did, the lawyer defending Shamima Begum could be arrested for terrorism, or the lawyer defending Fred West could be charged with mass murder. :rolleyes:
 
and defending the rights of an "Illegal Islamic group" in Egypt depends on how free a society is in that country

"Significant human rights issues included: unlawful or arbitrary killings, including extrajudicial killings by the government or its agents and terrorist groups; forced disappearance; torture; arbitrary detention; harsh and life-threatening prison conditions; political prisoners; arbitrary or unlawful interference with privacy; the worst forms of restrictions on free expression, the press, and the internet, including arrests or prosecutions against journalists, censorship, site blocking, and the existence of unenforced criminal libel; substantial interference with the rights of peaceful assembly and freedom of association, such as overly restrictive laws governing civil society organizations; restrictions on political participation; violence involving religious minorities; violence targeting lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) persons; use of the law to arbitrarily arrest and prosecute LGBTI persons; and forced or compulsory child labor."

(USA Government)

https://www.egyptindependent.com/hu...muslim-brotherhood-verdicts-blatantly-unjust/
 
I just provided the evidence to the people who said they didn’t believe me & to prove it. Shame they haven’t the balls to admit I was correct. Still that’s trolls for you. Cowards & strawmen
 
Could anyone post where I called Khant a terrorist, or will they deflect from their accusations?
I think I know the answer.
 
G, welcome to my isolation room, meet your cell mates, Bob le bigot & JohnD. You deserve each other. Bye bye.
 
Could anyone post where I called Khant a terrorist, or will they deflect from their accusations?
I think I know the answer.
I believe you said Sadie Khan doesn't condemn hate preachers and terrorists.

Although I'm not sure you've actually provided any evidence that proves that.
 
Where did I say he refuses to condemn hate preachers & terrorists???
I said he defends them. He campaigned to block Barber Arhmed the convicted Islamic terrorist & isis supporter being sent to America to face further charges.
He was the defence lawyer for Louis Farrakhan & the Nation of Islam when our home office denied them to enter the country spreading their poison. He wanted them to be allowed to preach their hate message here. He lost BTW.
How much evidence do you want me to provide. Nothing is untrue. Have the trolls lost wifi or something? They are normally quick off of the mark copying & pasting their disagreements.
 
Last edited:
Poor Dangee does not know what a law court is for.

Perhaps he knows about something else.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top