- Joined
- 17 May 2012
- Messages
- 10,790
- Reaction score
- 852
- Country
??????How come if you have enough cash you can see a doctor almost immediately.
Money talks. With enough cash you can have a live in doctor and nurse.
??????How come if you have enough cash you can see a doctor almost immediately.
Well in 2017 Germany spent 52% more per head.very interesting, I heard Jeremy Hunt on the radio yest saying "Uk now spends similar levels to other European nations"
Schools should go back to the old days and have craft blocks in them. Carpentry, metalwork, plumbing, bricklaying and general building/painting/tiling/decorating skills. Get kids interested and give them a taste of that type of work before leaving school.Charlie is right, we need to make use of our own people rather than importing from other countries, and for everything, not just the NHS.
The problem with relationships using GDP is that it doesn't relate to per capita sepnding which is the important factor really. Also capital invested related to that. Survays of the NHS has shown that they use gear that should have been thrown away years ago, The ventilators provided for the nightingale may have come out of a museum. Fortunately not used at all.Whereas Health spending as a % of GDP more healthy:
They might hurt themselves. No idea how I survived. There seems to e a bit of an improvement - tots with sharp knives, Scandinavian idea. Chopping up vegetables. Wide spread or not - pass.Carpentry, metalwork, plumbing,
Handy too, if you want to be a nurse or doctor!Schools should go back to the old days and have craft blocks in them. Carpentry, metalwork, plumbing, bricklaying and general building/painting/tiling/decorating skills. Get kids interested and give them a taste of that type of work before leaving school.
I'm still waiting for those brexers to start cockle-collecting and apple-picking.Charlie is right, we need to make use of our own people rather than importing from other countries, and for everything, not just the NHS.
That's why I gave per capita............................. keep up!The problem with relationships using GDP is that it doesn't relate to per capita sepnding which is the important factor really. Also capital invested related to that. Survays of the NHS has shown that they use gear that should have been thrown away years ago, The ventilators provided for the nightingale may have come out of a museum. Fortunately not used at all.
The Scandinavian countries have excellent health care and from working in Sweden a support system that works when people need it.
you're talking about the elderly british, who need more medical care, more often, for longer, at greater expensemost of whom fill our hospitals and GPs' waiting rooms daily claiming all the free stuff they're entitled to.
Not really. If instead of employing over-priced agency staff you employ cards-in staff it always costs less. In addition the cost to the economy of having so many people not in work through untreated illness is enormousThere is talk of putting medical people from other countries through less hoops if they come here. Depends on where they were trained.
There is a big but - more doctors and nurses etc increase running costs
The answer is probably yes - because they don't have so many private sector parasites feeding off themThat is certainly similar to European countries. It begs the question, do different countries deliver better value for money?