Post 36Neither can Notch
28242 July 4th to now (assumes 5,000 to date 2025, can’t be exact as it changes each day)
45,577 in 2022
Post 36Neither can Notch
Posting a link proves nothing.Oh you want the law..
Here you go..
Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002
An Act to make provision about nationality, immigration and asylum; to create offences in connection with international traffic in prostitution; to make provision about international projects connected with migration; and for connected purposes.www.legislation.gov.uk
And a nice essay here
We can’t forcibly remove people without reasonThe obligation comes in the form of forced removal
Here is the reality:Imagine 100k young strong Russians crossing all of Europe, aided by all governments to reach their preferred safe place (UK) where to apply for asylum.
Then, once let's say in Germany, these "legal" migrant, change their mind and occupy Berlin.
Or, they really come to UK and occupy London.
See how flawed your boll@x is?
It was Matt Hancock that put a protective arm around care homes whilst he seeded them with covid.

Grow up, Hancocks a **** aswell.It was Matt Hancock that put a protective arm around care homes whilst he seeded them with covid.

If you click it the relevant section is highlighted.Posting a link proves nothing.
You need to provide the exact quote from the link ( which doesn’t exist)

Obviously didn’t click the link either."The UK Government’s position is that refugees should claim asylum in the first safe country they reach. The UN Refugee Agency says this is not required by the Refugee Convention or international law."
MBK either didn't understand my request
or chose to give an irrelevant response, as a relevant one would have undermined his and Johnny's position.
As usual you're unable to read past the first line.Here is the reality:
There are around 75 million displaced people in the world.
Most stay in the country of origin
Those that flee mostly stay in neighbouring countries..eg Turkey has 4 million Syrian refugees.
And the remainder disperse over a wide area, across the EU, 7% come to the U.K.
If you want to argue they should claim asylum in the first safe country, then that would mean countries nearest would get overloaded and all other countries get none……ie just arbitrary chance of geography. That would be a silly way to decide things
Obviously didn’t click the link either.
Claim can be denied if links to a 3rd country.

Seek asylum elsewhere then apply to come to the UK. Just how exactly do they do that?Read ALL of my post so to discover that I didn't say asylum seekers must remain in the first safe country they reach.

Why do most of them want to come to the UK? Why not live in France?Seek asylum elsewhere then apply to come to the UK. Just how exactly do they do that?

Language, family, lots of different reasons. Why live in France?Why do most of them want to come to the UK? Why not live in France?

Most of them don't, far from it.Why do most of them want to come to the UK?