Looks like Starmer

Oh you want the law..

Here you go..


And a nice essay here

Posting a link proves nothing.

You need to provide the exact quote from the link ( which doesn’t exist)
 
20250323_211414.jpg
 
Imagine 100k young strong Russians crossing all of Europe, aided by all governments to reach their preferred safe place (UK) where to apply for asylum.
Then, once let's say in Germany, these "legal" migrant, change their mind and occupy Berlin.
Or, they really come to UK and occupy London.
See how flawed your boll@x is?
Here is the reality:

There are around 75 million displaced people in the world.

Most stay in the country of origin
Those that flee mostly stay in neighbouring countries..eg Turkey has 4 million Syrian refugees.

And the remainder disperse over a wide area, across the EU, 7% come to the U.K.



If you want to argue they should claim asylum in the first safe country, then that would mean countries nearest would get overloaded and all other countries get none……ie just arbitrary chance of geography. That would be a silly way to decide things
 
It was Matt Hancock that put a protective arm around care homes whilst he seeded them with covid.
Grow up, Hancocks a **** aswell.

So Starmer just put an extra nail in the coffin? Nice man you look up to.
 
Last edited:
"The UK Government’s position is that refugees should claim asylum in the first safe country they reach. The UN Refugee Agency says this is not required by the Refugee Convention or international law."

MBK either didn't understand my request




or chose to give an irrelevant response, as a relevant one would have undermined his and Johnny's position.
Obviously didn’t click the link either.

Claim can be denied if links to a 3rd country.
 
Here is the reality:

There are around 75 million displaced people in the world.

Most stay in the country of origin
Those that flee mostly stay in neighbouring countries..eg Turkey has 4 million Syrian refugees.

And the remainder disperse over a wide area, across the EU, 7% come to the U.K.



If you want to argue they should claim asylum in the first safe country, then that would mean countries nearest would get overloaded and all other countries get none……ie just arbitrary chance of geography. That would be a silly way to decide things
As usual you're unable to read past the first line.
Read ALL of my post so to discover that I didn't say asylum seekers must remain in the first safe country they reach.
 
Read ALL of my post so to discover that I didn't say asylum seekers must remain in the first safe country they reach.
Seek asylum elsewhere then apply to come to the UK. Just how exactly do they do that?
 
Back
Top