Your finances have to be a car wreck if you inherit a house worth 930,000 and can't get a mortgage of 125,000 on it and have to sell and go through an IVA instead.
-
Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.
Katie Hopkins
- Thread starter securespark
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 24,788
- Reaction score
- 5,340
- Country
Net worth of 2m isn’t broke. We are in 2025.
Shame, she deserves worse.
edit: although Google doesn't quickly return any support for that number?
no that’s not the reason, the court case wasn’t about the mistaken identity.
The reason Jack Monroe took her to court was because Hopkins refused to retract and apologise.
Katie Hopkins was a gobby right winger who was so arrogant she thought she could get away with it.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 24,788
- Reaction score
- 5,340
- Country
Incorrect.
The demand for an apology was not sincere. It was linked to terms that Hopkins would have found unacceptable.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 24,788
- Reaction score
- 5,340
- Country
The case was about defamation. There is no defence of mistake. What she said was incorrect and it caused damages to the reputation of the defamed.
You are welcome to join nosenout in the stupid corner if you want.
If she'd gone for a sincere apology then it would have cut the legs out from Monroes case though. But she didn't.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 24,788
- Reaction score
- 5,340
- Country
Exactly.
Ignore the demand for a donation. Issue a clarification, correct the record.
Damages limited.
whataboutery
you falsely claimed the case was mistaken identity, it was not.
the case was about Hopkins not apologising
Motorbiking is wrong as always poor chap
but you originally said the case was about mistaken identity
so thank you for admitting you were totally and utterly wrong
we got there eventually
this is what you originally claimed:
- Joined
- 11 Jan 2004
- Messages
- 45,845
- Reaction score
- 3,514
- Country
Disability campaigners obviously think there is enough in what she has posted to make a complaint to the police and ask them to investigate with a view to prosecution:
Online Abuse: Posting hateful messages or images online, targeting someone based on their race, religion, disability, or sexual orientation.
Now, here's an interesting thing.
Could KH be breaching the Equality Act 2010?
And another thing...
Why is she so repulsed by visible disabilities? It's quite pathetic and childish really.
Well, I say childish, but it's not quite like that. I now wear orthotic boots because my right foot is a different shape and a leg splint to help with foot drop due to my CP. I also have a raised sole as my right leg is a lot shorter. Over the years kids have noticed (because they are bright and observant) and asked "Why are your shoes different?", or, "Why have you got that thing on your leg?", or, "Why do you walk funny?" None of these questions have a nasty tone or intention. They are just curious.
I just explain that since I was born, my right leg and foot didn't grow properly and I need different shoes and this thing to help me walk better.
Their responses have been very sweet. Some have smiled and skipped away, some have said thank you, one girl even kissed my knee. I told her she would make a wonderful doctor one day. Her Mum was well chuffed!
Absolutely none of them retched and mocked me.
If Hopkins had gone for a sincere apology, Monroe would not have taken her to court
wrong, see above
- Status
