Woman and Sex, means biological sex.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Never heard of anyone getting in trouble for misidentify a non-man or non-woman?
I've never heard of anybody whose job it is to assess the risks of transferring prisoners from one type of prison to another etc losing their job for saying "I think it would be unsafe to move this prisoner to a Category D prison." Or "I think it would be unsafe to move this prisoner out of the segregation unit." Or "I think it would be unsafe to grant this prisoner parole." Or "I think it would be unsafe to grant this prisoner day release." Or "I think it would be unsafe to allow this prisoner to attend the funeral." Or "I think it would be unsafe to move this prisoner to a female prison."


Morthquana is the new Himmy, ignore his stupidity.
How is it stupid to describe members of a group which says things like "We’re passionate about bringing the love, justice, truth, freedom and hope of Jesus Christ to the heart of society. And we’re building a movement of Christians who share that passion" as Christians?
 
Last edited:
Well we do by your own argument as freedom of religious belief is a cornerstone of human rights.
You can believe what you like - I'm not proposing thought crime.

You may not act on your beliefs to the detriment of others.
 
Yes, any possible treatments will be discussed with the parents beforehand, if an actual condition is identified.

That's a far cry from,
If you're going to use surgery to rectify ambiguous genitalia you're going to have to decide what changes to make to arrive at unambiguous ones.

If a "condition" is "identified" than that will be because tests show that the baby does not meet whatever level of test result a male baby, or female baby, should. So treatments are used to bring about improvements in the test performance.
 
If a "condition" is "identified" than that will be because tests show that the baby does not meet whatever level of test result a male baby, or female baby, should.
Male or female hasn't been identified at that time, there is no pre conceived idea of what the outcome should be. Only that it is correct.
 
Normal as in, man and woman as that is what this thread is about. Its not about disabilities!!
Says one of the worst offenders here for shouting that people who for them do not feel that they fit into the "normal" man/woman categories are mentally ill, sick, abnormal...
 
I think the last government also amended building regs. to stop gender natural toilets.

Did you bother to read as far as the 3rd bullet:

separate facilities for men and women, except where each toilet is in a separate room lockable from the inside
 
Wanting to have a space for the exclusive use of women, or of men, or of kittens, is not a religious exemption.
If it's wanting to have it for religious reasons then it is a religious exemption.

The reasons for wanting single sex spaces may sometimes be based on religious belief, and sometimes not.
If not, then it's not wanting it for religious reasons.

If it is based on religious belief then it is.
 
And you have never heard that decisions are sometimes made to "make" the baby into a male, or a closer approximation, or a female, ditto, which in later life the person wishes had been made the other way?
 
And you have never heard that decisions are sometimes made to "make" the baby into a male, or a closer approximation, or a female, ditto,
No. Why would they make them into the opposite of what their examinations reveal?
which in later life the person wishes had been made the other way?
That happens, doesn't mean they were deliberately recorded as the wrong sex.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top