Wait all you like, I'm not under any obligation to be your Google monkey.Still waiting for these figures, stem and base separate
Wait all you like, I'm not under any obligation to be your Google monkey.Still waiting for these figures, stem and base separate
Wait all you like, I'm not under any obligation to be your Google monkey.
The resources used to make wind turbines for instance, offsets the energy they produce.No, then another 10% from Nuclear, roughly 10% from ICs and 7% from Biomass. Fossil fuels are making up around 40% though. But then again no one else has claimed we've got net zero yet. Just you.
Are you ever going to accept you're just not very well informed on this stuff?
I have feeling you just made that up...The resources used to make wind turbines for instance, offsets the energy they produce.
Beats being a Trump HS, I guess (low bar I know).I'm sure aveatry will settle for you being a monkey.
They really don't. How do people fall for this sort of drivel?The resources used to make wind turbines for instance, offsets the energy they produce.
Also, a good proportion of UK installed turbines are made here.
I have feeling you just made that up...
How do people fall for this sort of drivel?
Looks like a load of hot air to me. Where do you dredge this rubbish up from?
It's along read. What parts of the paper do you think bolster your argument? Quote the text if you like and post it up.The title says it all - Without the hot air. Reasonable, and well regarded review of the true situation, with no axe to grind. Obviously you have either not read it, cannot read, or you suffer attention deficit.
But then again no one else has claimed we've got net zero yet. Just you.
Is that a compliment?You pair are like Abbott and Costello
You pair are like Abbott and Costello![]()
![]()
![]()
That's Laurel and Hardy, dumbo.That's another fine mess, they got themselves into Ollie.
That Laurel and Hardy, dumbo.
Why would anyone think otherwise
That's another fine mess, they got themselves into Ollie.