You didn't give one at all. I take it you still believe the Egyptians were incapable of moving that obelisk into position but that the Romans were able to move it later?
Aliens are real?
- Thread starter Koolpc
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- 11 Dec 2012
- Messages
- 4,493
- Reaction score
- 2,225
- Country
This year we have seen more people coming forward regarding their experiences with uap phenomena. Is their own evidence to be pushed aside and ignored?
The skeptics will continue to mock.
For me, i keep an open mind about it all and i def lean on the side that we aint alone. There is just too much evidence to suggest otherwise. Evidence that the skeptics push aside too easily...
The skeptics will continue to mock.
For me, i keep an open mind about it all and i def lean on the side that we aint alone. There is just too much evidence to suggest otherwise. Evidence that the skeptics push aside too easily...
With zero credible footage - surprise surprise.
Yes.
Correct.
Very noble. They won't be visiting earth, anytime soon.
Life out there - possibly.
Visiting Earth - not in your wildest dreams.
What answer?
You have repeatedly said there is loads of evidence out there and have repeatedly refused to post up anything. How you manage to conceal this abundance of evidence is astonishing. You'd think it would be displayed front and centre of every media outlet.
Last edited:
In the timescale, and with the ease suggested, yes! There is much more to it than we think we know. The 'much more' is the question, that nobody comes up with an explanation for.
At that - I will block you, because I cannot be bothered wasting further time on repeating the same things, in response to you..
Quite! The way I see it, is that 99% of the reports, are false/mistaken identification and etc., but there is that 1% that are worthy of further investigation.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,984
- Reaction score
- 3,069
- Country
Plenty of evidence fort how they did it, including an eye witness accounts of people working in the quarries and shipping the blocks that built the pyramids.
So, for instance, if I wrote that I built my fairly large home, brick by brick, in a week, you would happily believe that without question?
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,984
- Reaction score
- 3,069
- Country
No. That would be silly.
But that isn't what the eyewitness wrote, which was a detailed account of the quarrying/shipping operations that were used in the construction of the pyramids.
No sillier than your believing how quickly and easily pyramids were built.
What if my description were more detailed, as to how I managed it in a week - would that qualify?
The point is, writing an account - the account can say what ever the writer wants it to say. You discount the writings in the bible (which I agree are nonsense), yet you accept the account of the pyramids being built, as being accurate, and beyond question. Both accounts, are from similar times, in the distant past.
Is this the same bloke that would rather believe aliens built the Pyramids of Giza?
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,984
- Reaction score
- 3,069
- Country
There are no eye witness accounts in the bible.
They weren't built quickly or easily. It was a mammoth task.
It's credible evidence whereas yours is top secret. Gut feelings don't count.
Ezekiel was taken up to heaven in a fiery chariot - how to explain that?
That's clearly moronic. You have no idea how long it is claimed that particular obelisk took to be moved the first time or the second. I doubt either were easy.
You refuse to accept that the Egyptians moved it but insist that the Romans were able to despite using the same techniques.
Utterly idiotic.
- Status
