Channel migrants face lifetime ban on returning to UK

You justify your statement about political control of the BBC

That some how they suspended linegar because of Tory influence
Just look at the reasons why he has been forced to "step back". Undue pressure from the Government.

Or do you think the top bosses at the BBC (Johnsons friend, involved in a row over a loan) decided that a private tweet over ruled his non political presenting, without any pressure from Braverman and Sunak?

Your welcome to your opinion of course, but to believe there has been no pressure is more than a little naive
 
He's become to be known as Mr BBC so he could have kept his head down and took the money like the other institutionalized figureheads before him. Not for Gary, he's bigger than the BBC in his minds eye, gone political and broken the bbcs impartiality rules and paid for the privilege.
A period of reflection that people who pay his wages can go to prison if they don't pay his wages (1 million and counting) might just hit home, might, being the operative word.
 
Lineker and the rest of you can fck off to your home or your 2nd home maybe your 3rd. That's fine have an opinion, voice it too, but sometimes it might just be unsuitable.
Look at Pat Sharp today made a self deprecating joke about a woman and shazam his contract that was apparently ending anyway ended even sooner.
No its not necessary to make negative connotations and associations to what's going on now to something years back that doesn't compare.

We are struggling to support our own homeless and lower classes here too. You been to a doctors dentist hospital lately?

The only people benefitting from this influx of people are the slave trade. Using your notoriety and public image to drive your own agenda i think is one that needs consideration.
 
So, if I've got this right, people who the government have declared are criminals will no longer be "allowed" to attempt to enter the country "illegally".

Farage told us that most people arriving on boats bypass immigration.

What exactly will change, other than more people bypassing immigration?
 
We're not struggling to; we haven't been bothered to, for a long time.
There's a huge difference.
Agree but either way we don't need civil unrest on top of all our other issues, which includes routing our whole parliamentary corrupt system. Changing the house of commons into an arena not opposing benches and having a cohesive front with accountability check points.
 
Unsuitability is in the eye of the beholder.

If he calls out a bunch of tnucs, is his opinion "unsuitable", and to whom?
He's calling them out like he always has. I dont like the tories i dont like labour but either side ill sing their merits. But he i can't help but feel his agenda is polarised one way only, that's a bias not a balanced opinion.
 
Back
Top