When ?
Probably when most life on earth was wiped out.
And how did it work out for the life on the planet at the time?
No, the difference is clear and easy to understand. Deniers just keep spouting the same nonsense in an attempt to discredit the science that they don't understand.
The phrase spitting your dummy out is not an insult its a description of what happened. As for the other stuff you need to look harder try "Ice Cores"
I never spat it out, nor left the forum, so I really don't understand.
You even were active there -- Ice cores - mind blown thread.
A reminder of this conversation and what the two of us are discussing - I am saying that the current earths temperature rise and its alleged speed are not unprecedented in earths history ---- and the ice cores show that.
So what. It doesn't matter if there were mush faster rises before, which there weren't. It matters now because we are causing it.
I'll think about it.
all previous mass extinctions have been linked to rapid cooling - asteroid strike, dust blocked out sun - overactive volcanoes pumping too much ash out, blocking the sun - and an interesting one, 'the late devonshire (sic)" apparently too many plants sucked too much carbon out of the atmosphere which led to a massive ice age - virtually everything died
I think it’s the other way round, the younger generation care ( and understand) far more about climate change than the older generation
Likewise someone who doesnt understand it does not make them thick either!!!!!
