• Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.

Climate Change

Yes we can.

There’s plenty of data that shows it is a direct result of nabs activity

I see Aveatry liked your climate misinformation post……he likes lies and misinformation.
You can't argue my comment because I wrote Fact after it...
 
You can't argue my comment because I wrote Fact after it...
Oh I am sorry, I didn’t realise you were not capable of an adult discussion.

My apologies, from now on I will treat you as you want to be treated.
 
Yes we can.

There’s plenty of data that shows it is a direct result of nabs activity

I see Aveatry liked your climate misinformation post……he likes lies and misinformation.
Take it there's no data that shows what would have happened if we wasn't here? It might just be the circle of life....as Elton once said :-)
 
Take it there's no data that shows what would have happened if we wasn't here? It might just be the circle of life....as Elton once said :)
Only in an alternate universe.
Man made CC is irrefutably proven using scientific data from around the world.
You lot are just saying "no it isn't" using random YT video.
 
poverty is what drives crime, not race

But race is what drives VIOLENT crime. Have you not noticed the gang members spearing each other in ethnic areas of London, etc. States it's more likely to be a gun in the hood rather than a knife.

Or alternatively you can just keep denying reality.

 
Last edited:

Exxon scientists accurately predicted the pace and scale of climate change more than 40 years ago, according to a study that its authors say adds weight to claims the oil firm knew about and sought to downplay the risks posed by continued fossil fuel use.

Scientists working for Exxon between 1977 and 2003 accurately forecasted the rate at which global average temperatures would rise as a result of carbon emissions, correctly predicted that human-caused global warming would first be detectable by around 2000 and reasonably estimated how much carbon dioxide would lead to dangerous warming, according to the study.

Leaked internal documents published in 2015 suggest Exxon, which became ExxonMobil in 1999, was aware of climate change in the 1970s and knew the threat could cause “dramatic environmental effects before the year 2050”.

For decades, Exxon executives argued in public that the science of climate change was still uncertain, with former CEO Lee Raymond warning in 2000 that research wasn’t robust enough to “justify drastic measures” to cut emissions. The firm has also been criticsed for funding groups that promoted misleading information on climate change.

NewScientist

Further information and in-depth analysis @Science.org
I remember environmentalists of the time being dismissed as cranks when they tried to bring information on changes in the Earth's climate to a global audience and, as the AMA tried to conceal the truth about smoking in the 50s, were subjected to a smear campaign that still goes on, despite the evidence.
 
Yep more eco BS they were deemed more eco friendly along with low friction piston rings -- that then start to burn oil after 2 or 3 years - feel scammed yet.

I get the idea that cars these days are designed to make more money in parts, service and repairs for the manus. and maybe be so fragile and problematic to dissuade us from owning them.
 
a diesel engine is more complex with expensive parts that can go wrong: dual mass flywheel, DPF, turbo, injectors

With the possible exception of the DMF, many petrol engines have all the items you list. In addition, petrol engines also have an ignition system with all the necessary components for that. So not sure how you can say diesel is more complex.
 
But race is what drives VIOLENT crime. Have you not noticed the gang members spearing each other in ethnic areas of London, etc. States it's more likely to be a gun in the hood rather than a knife.

Or alternatively you can just keep denying reality.

That study doesn’t help your argument

I suggest you actually read it.

 
Back
Top