D
Deleted member 294929
Have you got a link that backs this up?
You don't believe criminals are involved in all this? Really.......
Have you got a link that backs this up?
Sort of yes
Spoke to my neighbour who is just back from France
That's a good source. A chat over the garden fence is the best link there is..
It depends whether you think £5 billion to send 3,100 asylum seekers over a period of 8 years is a success.
I don’t.
Yes exactly
The policy is to ultimately save lives
People drowning in the channel
The Australian one cost £5 billion pounds since it started in 2013 and has only returned 400 a year.What really matters is the longer term outcome and result, how much is saved, versus spent on this.
That's a very good point Harry... I suspect there are a few on here who would say "why not"The alternative to save lives would be to throw open the UK border to all comers - now how much would that cost?
The Australian one cost £5 billion pounds since it started in 2013 and has only returned 400 a year.
It will be a complete waste of money and it will fail
That's a very good point Harry... I suspect there are a few on here who would say "why not"
The alternative to save lives would be to throw open the UK border to all comers - now how much would that cost?
It depends whether you think £5 billion to send 3,100 asylum seekers over a period of 8 years is a success.
I don’t.
The Tory party may be claiming they are doing it to saves livesHow many lives did it save ??
The Australian one cost £5 billion pounds since it started in 2013 and has only returned 400 a year.
It will be a complete waste of money and it will fail