It might but it is nowhere near unanimous as JohnD keeps pretending.And if you look at you very own graph, the urge to leave increases stepwise by age...
It might but it is nowhere near unanimous as JohnD keeps pretending.And if you look at you very own graph, the urge to leave increases stepwise by age...
Can you try and explain why the 52% voted for something that can't be explained ?
Do you have all this canned? Just the same copy pasta that will cause nothing but a merry-go-round of boredom and insults.
No, because our government doesn't know what brexit is yet. I think you could have better worded your question and asked 'can you please tell us what kind brexit you want', in which case I could simply say the one I was told I would be voting for.
That is unless you have forgotten what Cameron told us.
Can you explain why so many people believe in God?
A free choice, nobody forces you to join in, or follow.
Yes.Can you explain why so many people believe in God?
Yes.
They cannot or do not think for themselves.
Some might be forced to pretend they believe but it does not affect whether they actually do or not.For some maybe but not for all accrues the lands
Id like to see how People of religion who believe in God voted.
Thus the wrinklies who voted to leave are relying on the younger generations to fund their retirement.
Is this what Cameron told us ?
https://www.conservativehome.com/parliament/2016/05/camerons-speech-on-brexit-full-text.html
He clearly states he doesn't know what brexit is, or any advantages. I am asking the same question, what is brexit? You, and others voted for it. Explain it to me, and others.
It is boring and goes round in circles, simply because nobody (including bj, farage, ree smogg, gove etc) can or will say what brexit is.
If you understand it, explain it. It was clearly told by the leave campaigners, that it would be better for us. How, why? Not wooly replies, but real constructive comments.
Or was it just an immigration vote? I think that is what it is. Prove me wrong
View attachment 149006
https://www.ft.com/content/b52f1b0a-7aee-11e5-a1fe-567b37f80b64
It was to my understanding there was no hard, no soft, no renegotiation, no chequers deal, no half in half out. It was a clean break.
And that's what I'd prefer now. No deal. If we want a deal later we negotiate a deal later, not while we're in limbo and May is giving away her hand.
So you didn't vote for what is going on then ?
Feel misled ?
Misled by the leave campaigners about how simple it would be, let alone all the benefits.
Ah but don't fool yourself into thinking that means I'd rather have muh sheeples vote and remain.