It's their descendants who continue to suffer from the discrimination invented to justify the slave trade.
It's the ex-slave owners who continue to benefit from the wealth accrued by those slave owners.
The trans-Sahara slave trade was separate to the trans-Atlantic slave trade.
Your argument is fallacious.
It's like arguing that American Indians sacrificed children, so why shouldn't the British.
Let's throw the Irish into the fray - A good horse from Byzantium could be worth up to twenty cumal (female) slaves.
Perhaps @Vinty would like to pop in to apologise for his ancestors heinous trade?
They like to think of it as Nationalism, these days.She was a Ugandan judge who also worked for the UN.
And your blatant racism is of benefit to society?
