Rubbish.
If something is not correct, it is wrong, end of.
The word speculative is superfluous.
For example: if I said George Soros has British citizenship......that is not correct. I cant say, its not correct and yet highly speculative.......the secondbpoint is negated by the first.
Eeyore is concentrating on part of a sentence again. Either because his donkey brain cannot understand the rest of the sentence, or because he chooses to ignore it because it does not fit into his pattern of restricted thought.
You started by saying:
It can be one or the other, not both
Now you are trying to dismiss one side of the equation as superfluous.
If I said: eeyore displays intelligence in his reply, he must be intelligent. It would be highly speculative
and not correct.
If I said: eeyore displays his typical nonsensical stupidity in his replies. It would not be speculative, it would be based on previous evidence,
and it would be correct.
As I said, a**e end had no idea whether his assertion was correct or not.
But he made his comment anyway, irrespective of the fact he knew he was probably telling lies, spreading malicious gossip, and displaying his own disgusting brand of bigotry.
It is what he does.
It is what he is.
And, when his trumped-up assertions are challenged, you persistently defend his lies, with your special version of nonsense.
How does it feel to be the defender of the indefensible? What is more, you are defending malicious lies and specious gossip! You cannot know whether a**e end's comment was correct or not, yet you spring to defend the assertion, fully aware that it is contrived.
So mightygob-esque. It was her peculiar talent for defending the indefensible, especially a**e end, that made it apparent that she was clueless, and defending persistent and compulsive liars.
You appear to have a very good understanding of her opinions because you keep telling us why she left the forum, despite the fact the she left just before you joined.