Johnson Sinks to New Low

[Deleted member 18243]

are you saying Labour have more sex offenders than Conservative????

Given that Labour is the party of communists and other misfits and weirdos it is bound to have more than its share of sex offenders.

 

[Deleted member 18243]

Given that Labour is the party of communists and other misfits and weirdos it is bound to have more than its share of sex offenders.

Plus, it's the party with the most muslims.

 

[Notch7]

it is bound to

Oh come on Andy, thats not a great answer, is it

you are a strange chap

 

[Notch7]

Sir Roger Gale, who was first elected in 1983, said:

"Grim scenes outside Parliament today and disgraceful treatment of Sir Keir Starmer.

This, I fear, is the direct result of the deliberately careless use of language in the chamber."



https://www.kentonline.co.uk/herne-...eless-language-blamed-for-starmer-abu-262058/

 

[ajohn]

This, I fear, is the direct result of the deliberately careless use of language in the chamber."

No I fear about it but needs to be more careful about what he says out of the house as all do.

 

[^woody^]

Sir Roger Gale, who was first elected in 1983, said:

"Grim scenes outside Parliament today and disgraceful treatment of Sir Keir Starmer.

This, I fear, is the direct result of the deliberately careless use of language in the chamber."



https://www.kentonline.co.uk/herne-...eless-language-blamed-for-starmer-abu-262058/

Rubbish

The mob accused Starmer of agreeing with the Tories, of being a traitor (for agreeing) of being "part of the new world order" (anti-vaxers) of not challenging in the vaccine rollout.

Yes one single shout was "Jimmy Saville", but quiet and not as persistent of the other chants.

So nothing to do with what Boris said to Starmer. Not only do you fail to read facts, you fail to listen to videos too. Sad

 

[Notch7]

So nothing to do with what Boris said to Starmer. Not only do you fail to read facts, you fail to listen to videos too. Sad

Woody says Sir Roger Gale is talking rubbish

Yes one single shout was "Jimmy Saville", but quiet and not as persistent of the other chants

Woody conveniently ignores the shouts of "paedo protector"

Not only do you fail to read facts, you fail to listen to videos too. Sad

says Woody failing to notice the entire post was a quote by Sir Roger Gale


It is sad when people have to be dishonest in order to continue protecting Johnson the liar

 

[Vinty]

they unnecessarily hampered their chances of getting the victims to agree to give evidence

To be fair, if the victims are not prepared to give evidence, then there no point in going to trial.

 

[AngleEyes]

To be fair, if the victims are not prepared to give evidence, then there no point in going to trial.

If the victims are not prepared to give evidence then there is no evidence.
"Anything asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence."
Or words to that effect.

 

[Notch7]

To be fair, if the victims are not prepared to give evidence, then there no point in going to trial.

when victims came forward, the police did not tell the victim that there were others -which may have given them confidence to proceed.


In these cases there is no evidence or proof, its just based on somebodies word -it is understandable why the CPS decided not to proceed, I dont see that anybody is to blame

in the case of Carl Beech the police went the other way...

 

[ajohn]

in the case of Carl Beech the police went the other way...

The police have changed how they go about handling this type of problem. Starrmer made some suggestions.

 

[ajohn]

Boris is saying he will not apologise for the comment he made. Does this sound familiar?

Actually the comment should be retracted.

 

[AngleEyes]

Given that Labour is the party of communists and other misfits and weirdos it is bound to have more than its share of sex offenders.

Plus, it's the party with the most muslims.

Pure unadulterated racism from the rabid racist.

 

[ajohn]

Immigration has always mainly concerned people for jobs. Refugees are a somewhat different matter where international law kicks in.

Behind it all few governments will want to see 100% real full employment. A surplus is needed.

 

[JohnD]

It is sad when people have to be dishonest in order to continue protecting Johnson the liar

surely supporters of Johnson have no objection to dishonesty.