Katie Hopkins

[carmanmemoranda]

Typical how the rwr try and defend her too.

Anybody with common decency wouldn't

 

[noseall]

Typical how the rwr try and defend her too.

They idolise her like they do Trump. Lying scumbags - ideal RWR spokes-people.

 

[Lirefighter]

Typical how the rwr try and defend her too.

Anybody with common decency wouldn't

What are the rwr?

 

[noseall]

What are the rwr?

A despicable bunch.

 

[noseall]

What are the rwr?

Right Wing Reeturds

 

[Notch7]

Anyway back to the debate, it was common ground, (judge, the claimant and the defendant) that the first tweet was a case of mistaken identity - referenced no less than 8 times in the judgement. 19, 22, 28, 49, 71-3,5,10 and 81.

I won't hold my breath for Nosenout and Notchy to apologise. Pete's summary was correct

WRONG

The case was not about mistaken identity, it was about defamation.

Petal01 started made a post about mistaken identity as a strawman, the case had nothing to do with it.

For a lawyer Motorbiking doesn’t seem to think very clearly

 

[noseall]

WRONG

The case was not about mistaken identity, it was about defamation.

Petal01 started made a post about mistaken identity as a strawman, the case had nothing to do with it.

Correct. In actual fact JM was prepared to let that one go. Hopkins basically brought it upon herself. She thought she could trample all over a 'woke lefty lesbian'. Instead she got owned. Sweet justice.

Motorbiking doesn’t seem to think very clearly

Standard.

 

[noseall]

For a lawyer Motorbiking doesn’t seem to think very clearly

He's a boat captain....

 

[blup]

If costs can be awarded either way, you can go CFA. it does make it rather high risk though.

Anyway back to the debate, it was common ground, (judge, the claimant and the defendant) that the first tweet was a case of mistaken identity - referenced no less than 8 times in the judgement. 19, 22, 28, 49, 71-3,5,10 and 81.

How can someone get the wrong person and then tweet as if it didn't make any difference.

 

[motorbiking]

Litigation wasn't a thing even after the the mistaken identity revelation. What did it for Monroe occurred AFTER Hopkins had realised her mistake, i.e. no contrition/apology from Hopkins and the fact that she doubled down on her vile texts. The RWR gobshíte thought she'd bag herself a 'lefty lesbian', but instead got owned.

Monroe was reluctant to sue from the outset.

Sweet as a nut.

Not true. You really do have to read the judgement.

 

[motorbiking]

WRONG

The case was not about mistaken identity, it was about defamation.

Petal01 started made a post about mistaken identity as a strawman, the case had nothing to do with it.

You’re moving away from the original argument in order to avoid being wrong.

Hopkins defamation was due to mistaken identity that is all Pete suggested. You and Nosenout rolled around laughing, saying how it was a stretch to pretend Hopkins made a mistake. In fact it was clearly accepted fact in the judgement.

But you and Nosenout can never accept you are wrong and just keep trying to twist the facts hoping you get away with it.

The fact is Pete was correct when he said

Yes she should of just apologised, she confused jack with another woman from what I was reading so it wouldn't of been embarrassing.

This caused Nosenout to wet his pants laughing.
But actually it turns out he’s the fool again.

 

[motorbiking]

Typical how the rwr try and defend her too.

Anybody with common decency wouldn't

Nobody has defended her.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Nobody has defended her.

She lost her case, that she knowingly made worse.

Some people are twisting and turning to state it differently

 

[transam]

I don’t know any thing about her ? Never really heard of her ? Apart from in here

The point is

Is she fit ????

 

[noseall]

How can someone get the wrong person and then tweet as if it didn't make any difference.

And that is the crux of the reason the case went to court.