Mandelson

Pulitzer law suit ?
Seven years ago, The New York Times and The Washington Post received Pulitzers for their respective coverage of Trump’s Russia scandal, and by any fair standard, the honours were well deserved.

Trump has been fuming since and has sued the Pulitzer board, even after a review found the award winning articles to be truthful. It goes against the MAGA narrative that the Muller enquiry and its findings were a hoax.

And now they smell blood and folks are loving it.
 
IMG_1121.jpeg


So how many have you done now Keir Starmer in 19 months - 14? 15? 16?
 

Blair era (1998)

  • Mandelson resigned as Trade and Industry Secretary after it emerged he’d taken an undeclared £373,000 loan from a fellow minister. - Basically lies and dishonesty proved he couldn't be trusted.
Brown era (2001)
  • Under Gordon Brown, Mandelson resigned again,this time as Northern Ireland Secretary.
    Basically lies and dishonesty proved he couldn't be trusted.
Starmer (2025)
Mandelson 'Found' to be best mates with Epstein. (which was common knowledge for some time in many circles.

Sorry but if Starmer and co genuinely say they are shocked he lied and didn't realise he couldn't be trusted, on top of trying to manipulate this enquiry they should all go down.
Politicians have to know how to lie mislead and manipulate, and deal with regimes far worse record than Mandy. The PM took a balanced view that despite all the negatives Mandy was the right person to deal with Trumpf, who is also associated with Epsteen.
 
Anything from Far rage on all this other than taking the opportunity to give Starmmer a kicking.
 
Politicians have to know how to lie mislead and manipulate, and deal with regimes far worse record than Mandy. The PM took a balanced view that despite all the negatives Mandy was the right person to deal with Trumpf, who is also associated with Epsteen.
Miliband chose not to, Corbyn chose not to.
Why?
Because they made the right choice balancing risk over reward, includng ultimately their own tenure as PM.

We now know for Starmer, that view was incorrect, and if as you say he took that balanced view knowing he caclculated risk its ok for a man known to be good friends of a convicted paedophile to be ambasador for the UK, well, even more so thats on him, live by the sword...
 
Last edited:
Anything from Far rage on all this other than taking the opportunity to give Starmmer a kicking.
Starmer is doing all his own kicking to his own head.
Starmer will be gone within days --- Remember where you heard it first.
 
It’s worth nothing that ITV News this evening at 10pm has suggested that NO Cabinet minister, has this evening, offered any form of support for the PM
 
Miliband chose not to, Corbyn chose not to.
Why?
Because they made the right choice balancing risk over reward, includng ultimately their own tenure as PM.

We now know for Starmer, that view was incorrect, and if as you say he took that balanced view knowing he caclculated risk its ok for a man known to be good friends of a convicted paedophile to be ambasador for the UK, well, even more so thats on him, live by the sword...
Mandy is good friends with a whole bunch of evil people as is Trumpf. There were hundreds of powerful rich individuals who stayed in contact with Epsteen. The episode shows how lacking in talent Starmmer was, and how Trumpf accepted Mandy knowing - as he must have- about his connections with Eppy. This can’t be reduced to a simple anti OM
headline
 
Mandy is heading for prison, passing secret government and banking information to someone in a position to profit millions from it, then receiving £75k. Wonder how much more money epstine past on to him
 
Back
Top