Why?I thought he might take on board our advice.
Ring circuits for sockets are not needed either, they just add significant extra work when testing.
No - it was a short term expedient kludge introduced at a time of a copper shortage and high material prices compared to labour costs which coincided with rapidly rising demands in houses and it enabled quick and dirty conversion of 16A radials to 30A rings.JohnD said:The UK ring circuit is such a tremendously wonderful invention
It only complies with the regulations because of the special-case hoops they jump through.
They are harder to test and harder to safely extend.
As yourself these simple questions -
1) if they are so good, why don't other countries have them?
2) if they did not exist, and all we had ever had were radials, who in their right mind would ever propose introducing them?
Those comments aren't really specific to rings - they relate to any situation (including radials) in which there are multiple sockets on a circuit which could not possibly sustain large loads plugged into several of the available sockets.The UK ring circuit is such a tremendously wonderful invention that it is mostly used in houses (and small shops/offices). ... One of the principles is that on one floor of a house you will want plenty of sockets, but almost all of these will be for low loads (TV, table lamp etc) and there is unlikely to be more than two heavy 3kW loads (fan heater, washing machine) in use at a time, and each heavy load will be occasional or intermittent. ... in a domestic environment, with the splendid UK fused plug, I think it is an excellent solution.
Then how can it be 'better' or worth doing?I have never claimed that it is an advantage.
It has a farthest point which is, in effect, wired in 5mm² which has a CCC of 54A but is limited to 32A.The ring is less liable to voltage drop towards the end, as it has no end.
As EFLI has pointed out, the ring's equivalent of 'the end' is 'the farthest point'. As he has also pointed out, the VD at that farthest point will be slightly less than that for a 4mm² radial, but only because the effective CSA of a ring final at that point is 5mm² - but that is very rarely going to be an issue/advantage in practice.I have never claimed that it is an advantage. The ring is less liable to voltage drop towards the end, as it has no end.
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local