Revoke Article 50 Petition crashed by volume of traffic.

[JohnD]

"No you didn't and besides I didn't see your post, I tend to skip most of yours if I can help it."

****.

 

[noseall]

Talk about argue for the sake of it, all because of a typo.

Hmm, some typo. You are the **** that got a rather important part of your sentence wrong boyo.

Take it on the chin.

 

[sodthisforfun]

surely not.

When I saw this, briefly, I just thought you were being sarcastic - as if 'brexiteers' wouldn't do such a thing. So I didn't think much of it and hadn't realised my mistake.

And yes, I will own up to a typo, but as I already said:

Most normal people would just say "Do you mean brexiteers, not remainers?"

Real simple and straight-forward and not at all condescending.

 

[noseall]

No you didn't.

He did - immediately after you posted.

surely not.

"'Cancel Brexit' petition woman receives death threats"

****.​

 

[transam]

He did - immediately after you posted.

****.​

What do u know. Noseall as per usual u jump on the band wagon

Tw@t

 

[transam]

Noseall calling some one a t@at he's got some nerve I will give the t@at that

 

[durhamplumber]

Brexit: Revoke Article 50 petition crashes Parliament website
Parliament's petitions website crashed on Thursday morning because of the high volume of traffic.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47652071​

The losers petition...!!!!!!...The destroyers of Democracy.UK traitors.

 

[durhamplumber]

900,048

17milion brexit heroes..verified!!...

 

[sodthisforfun]

He did - immediately after you posted.

****.​

In teeny tiny writing that I didn't see.

He seems to like doing that, writing so don't see it. Very odd.

"No you didn't and besides I didn't see your post, I tend to skip most of yours if I can help it."

****.

****

 

[ellal]

Talk about argue for the sake of it, all because of a typo.

'Typo' or ignorance?

Because the latter is what got us in this mess in the first place, and the former is a convenient excuse

 

[Notch7]

'Typo' or ignorance?

Because the latter is what got us in this mess in the first place, and the former is a convenient excuse

Ah bless.

Ellal is so desperate, he even makes an argument from a mere typo.

****
(Everybody else is adding this to the discussion, so who am I to buck the trend)

 

[JohnD]

In teeny tiny writing that I didn't see.

Don't be silly.

The only thing I put in faint text was my quotation of your abusive and silly remark. I made it faint because you have removed it from your own post now.

My post at 6.15 was perfectly clear and polite, but you didn't accept it.

remainers

surely not.

"'Cancel Brexit' petition woman receives death threats"

****.

 

[noseall]

In teeny tiny writing that I didn't see

Lol. Quit digging boyo.

 

[sodthisforfun]

"No you didn't and besides I didn't see your post, I tend to skip most of yours if I can help it."

****.

Don't be silly.

The only thing I put in faint text was my quotation of your abusive and silly remark. I made it faint because you have removed it from your own post now.






****.

As I said, I didn't see it. Nor was I aware of my typo still, so as I already explained, when I read you 'surely not', I thought you were being sarcastic.
Anyway, if it makes you feel better, continuing this 'lording it over' ****tishness, you carry on. I am glad I have played some part in making you feel good

Ps, they were not abusive remarks, they were factual. I removed them immediately anyway.

 

[noseall]

As I said, I didn't see it.

Hilarious.