Well in any EICR/PIR I have ever done, if I get to the point at any stage I halt the insp/test and and inform the customer if what I have discovered so far renders it so unsatisfactory that I have already concluded that a rewire is needed or a massive corrections regarding extense of works probably required and ask if they want me to carry on or end it and reduce my charges accordingly.An EICR requires the inspector to do a lot of work, which is not required if the result is a re-wire.
It would be absurd to carry on and complete the inspect and test to completion if it is so bad and it would be a waste of time and money to do so.
At the estimate stage (free of charge) I would take a decent cursory look around and advise my suspicions accordingly.
It would be futile to carry on the procedure to the end unless the customer insists.
Eric regarding "so with the papered wall the socket was in the corner, technically not permitted, " could you elaborate your meaning on this comment please? I`m a little lost, might be my error though as I am an old git these days
To do the EICR first to confirm the consumer unit change is viable without major corrections is the only sane approach.
To change the consumer unit without an EICR and then find a serious defect such a lack of adequate earthing/bonding or borrowed N etc etc would be almost criminal if not actually criminal surely.
If ever I here some "Electrician" state that they changed a consumer unit before adequate test and inspection such as an EICR the say it additional extra works to keep the installtion live before leaving because of borrowed N or unsafe sitions then I think "You Pilchard! You are not a pro"
