Terrorist attack in London

[Gerrydelasel]

Blithering idiot. It could easily have been 'allez' or 'on-y-va'

Yes, I suppose they could be shouting 'Allez Akbar'. Not sure about 'On-y-va Akbar' though. Doesn't seem to fit the... how can I put this... words you can hear?

 

[noseall]

The fact that the establishment and left-wing media desperately try to cover up any mention of Islam

Oh, didn't realise there was a cover-up. Only it was the French police that said this......
The police spokesman said that – contrary to some reports – there was ‘no terrorist or Islamist link to the attack whatsoever’.

He said there was ‘no evidence’ that religious slogans had been shouted out by the bus attackers.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3722765/Bus-torched-street-gang-brandishing-Molotov-cocktails-riots-against-police-racism-rage-troubled-suburb-Paris.html#ixzz4GM4lu1Ar
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Oh, and by the way, that's two reports from two politically opposing media outlets, that you could not find. I'm kinda thinking Ges, that the lies are more right wing orientated. You are more gullible that I thought Ges.

 

[LastMagicBean]

Only in as much as sooey accuses me of racism for referring to his red face caused by holding his breath.

STOP STOP You're killing me. Haven't stopped laughing since he posted that.

You're making it worse.

 

[noseall]

wish there was a neg button on here.

Don't we all bud, don't we all......

 

[noseall]

STOP STOP You're killing me. Haven't stopped laughing since he posted that.

You're making it worse.

Crikey, you're out of bed early. Just the one bottle of gin last night?

 

[Himaginn]

****ing hell Himmy, you really do need to calm down! It's because of you calling everyone racists

Everyone who, IMO, deserves to be called a racist.
I wish you'd get your facts straight, or stop inventing things.

that he made the joke in the first place!

Trivialising racism

When reason and talking do not work, sometimes humour is the best way to deal with a person like you.

Not by trivialising racism.
If we were discussing murder or rape, or any other serious subject would you resort to 'jokingly' accuse a contributor of the discussion as being perpetrator of the subject under discussion, especially when you knew it wasn't warranted?

And yes, it does have serious consequences but I wish you would actually understand that and stop calling everyone racist

You're getting your argument all mixed up again, or inventing a new one.

and to quote yourself, trivialise racism. And no, it's not funny but this does not stop you! You really do have one rule that applies to you and a different one for everyone else.

So show me where I trivialise racism.

I noticed you made no comment when I highlighted the proof that you called me an Islamophobic when you asked for it.

Because my reasons were contained within the same posts. Do you want/need me to repeat them?
If you defend racism, you are defending the indefensible. Why?
You are liable to be associated within that group. If it waddles like a duck, and it quacks like a duck..................
It's not sufficient to claim that you are not a racist, you have to act like you are not a racist.

Are you an utter coward as well as a ****head? This proves that you like to label people to try and win an argument because people dare not have the same view on everything as you. You ask people for apologies and retractions and yet you do not even admit your own failings for things much more serious that a joke. You seriously have a skewed view of yourself.

You're resorting to abuse and four-letter expletives again. It does little for your credibility.

 

[LastMagicBean]

Crikey, you're out of bed early. Just the one bottle of gin last night?

Can't sleep for laughing. And I've got two weeks off, it's gonna be torture.

 

[Himaginn]

He said there was ‘no evidence whatsoever’ that religious slogans had been shouted out by the bus attackers.

Except you can hear them shout Alluha Akbar, quite clearly. The fact that the establishment and left-wing media desperately try to cover up any mention of Islam as anything other than the religion of peace, is rather the point.

Blithering idiot. It could easily have been 'allez' or 'on-y-va' or any other French expression with which you are obviously unfamiliar.

Are you 100% correct on that? Just wondering before you call people blithering idiots.

Did you read my comment carefully before launching into another blind opposing commnet:

"It could easily"

So what you really meant to write was:

"We are not sure that alluh akbar was what was heard, it could've been something else".

Not call people blithering idiots and be condescending... is that much more of a balanced post? No, instead you just prove again and again that you're a dick, a condescending nasty dickhead.

So why didn't you respond to Gerrydelightful's post with your comment, in the way that you wanted to?

 

[blightymam]

He said there was ‘no evidence whatsoever’ that religious slogans had been shouted out by the bus attackers.

Except you can hear them shout Alluha Akbar, quite clearly. The fact that the establishment and left-wing media desperately try to cover up any mention of Islam as anything other than the religion of peace, is rather the point.

Blithering idiot. It could easily have been 'allez' or 'on-y-va' or any other French expression with which you are obviously unfamiliar.

Are you 100% correct on that? Just wondering before you call people blithering idiots.

Did you read my comment carefully before launching into another blind opposing commnet:

"It could easily"

So what you really meant to write was:

"We are not sure that alluh akbar was what was heard, it could've been something else".

Not call people blithering idiots and be condescending... is that much more of a balanced post? No, instead you just prove again and again that you're a dick, a condescending nasty dickhead.

So why didn't you respond to Gerrydelightful's post with your comment, in the way that you wanted to?

Why did you respond in such a condescending way?

 

[Himaginn]

Why did you respond in such a condescending way?

You think I should imitate you and respond to his claim with abusive four-letter expletives and juvenile insults?
We're not all like that.

 

[blightymam]

He said there was ‘no evidence whatsoever’ that religious slogans had been shouted out by the bus attackers.

Except you can hear them shout Alluha Akbar, quite clearly. The fact that the establishment and left-wing media desperately try to cover up any mention of Islam as anything other than the religion of peace, is rather the point.

Blithering idiot. It could easily have been 'allez' or 'on-y-va' or any other French expression with which you are obviously unfamiliar.

Are you 100% correct on that? Just wondering before you call people blithering idiots.

Did you read my comment carefully before launching into another blind opposing commnet:

"It could easily"

So what you really meant to write was:

"We are not sure that alluh akbar was what was heard, it could've been something else".

Not call people blithering idiots and be condescending... is that much more of a balanced post? No, instead you just prove again and again that you're a dick, a condescending nasty dickhead.

So why didn't you respond to Gerrydelightful's post with your comment, in the way that you wanted to?

Why did you respond in such a condescending way?

You think I should imitate you and respond to his claim with abusive four-letter expletives and juvenile insults?
We're not all like that.

Lol, told you before, it's only you that I swear at. And I will keep doing it until you realise what it is about your behaviour that warrants it.
And I think again you are being a little skewed on your behaviour, calling people names, which you did, is hardly better than swearing. It's still belittling and nasty. But you can do no wrong, right?

 

[noseall]

Can't you two edit your quotes better please. I keep getting poxy alerts.

 

[Himaginn]

It's still belittling and nasty.

So is abusive four-letter expletives.
Which is OK for you, but not OK for anyone else.
Double standards anyone?

 

[blightymam]

Can't you two edit your quotes better please. I keep getting poxy alerts.

Doesn't it make you feel loved tho?!

 

[blightymam]

It's still belittling and nasty.

So is abusive four-letter expletives.
Which is OK for you, but not OK for anyone else.
Double standards anyone?

Yes, I don't disagree, never said I did. I actually said your name calling is no better than my swear words.
I actually do this all the time to point out what you do, to give you a taste of your own medicine. Like how you've used my point to your behaviour and put it back on me, and yet can't understand or admit that you do this behaviour to others. You're a bit thick.
You can do no wrong, right?