US Milk - WTF?

I dont know -I thought WTA had something to do with tennis?
In any case I said free trade arrangement.





_98630427_wto_rules_640-nc.png

I take you didn't post the link to the page and fail to mention

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-41859691

Even with those 24, the EU has a variety of arrangements which make trade easier. For example, there is an agreement between the EU and the US about the language which can be used by wine exporters on their bottles.

So why didn't you post the full link?
 
Sponsored Links
It's almost as if notch was trying to mislead because his case is so weak.

Is such a thing possible?

Yes.

I'm sure Notch can give us examples of large, developed Western nations that don't have trade agreements and rely on WTA (sic - WTO) rules.

Which are they, Notch?

Notch doesn't know any.
 
Sponsored Links
"The Dow Jones fell more than 500 points after what European Commission leaders say is a "blatant" move to protect US industry"

US industry is not too keen either.

"The Dow Jones Industrial Average dived by more than 500 points as the move stoked fears of a global trade war and higher costs for US manufacturers."
 
What's your point?

Simple.

The EU makes WTO agreements.

Nation states cant.

Therefore JohnD's question has no point.

Like all remainers he is only interested in making a case for a current state of affairs with no consideration for the future.

And like all left wing remainers, never gives an answer how he reconciles his socialist principles with his support for a neo liberal project.


https://www.newstatesman.com/politi...-protect-workers-rights-it-has-destroyed-them
 
dishonest notch throws this nonsense in
it is all forgotten that trade happens without FTA.

but is unable to find an example comparable to the UK

I'm sure Notch can give us examples of large, developed Western nations that don't have trade agreements and rely on WTA (sic - WTO) rules.

Which are they, Notch?

....none, mutters notch
 
Simple.

The EU makes WTO agreements.

Nation states cant.

Therefore JohnD's question has no point.

Like all remainers he is only interested in making a case for a current state of affairs with no consideration for the future.

And like all left wing remainers, never gives an answer how he reconciles his socialist principles with his support for a neo liberal project.


https://www.newstatesman.com/politi...-protect-workers-rights-it-has-destroyed-them

So your a member of a club you agree to the terms. Are you saying renege?

John point (he can clarify) was which country trades on WTO basis alone anywhere in the world.

Why dont countries just trade on WTO terms only if it's such a great option? Why do they enter into Trade agreements?

Remainers position is clear. As a leaver you need to define exit, or your vision of it.

Also that articlearti posted the link to Martin Weale comment is dead. If you want to make an argument based on an unconfirmed comment then at least let me provide his actual opinion.

https://www.ft.com/content/123dcf90-ebd0-11e7-bd17-521324c81e23


Martin Weale, professor of economics, King’s College London and former member of the MPC Unclassified. The worst-case scenario — leaving the EU without any transition arrangement in place — now looks as though it will be avoided. But it is still very unclear whether it will be possible to negotiate an agreement which is only slightly, rather than appreciably, worse than we have at the moment. Over the medium term, with fewer gains from trade than the current arrangements allow, it seems likely that income will be materially depressed. But twelve months ago I was still hoping that the UK would negotiate an arrangement much like single market membership. It remains my view that is the best way of avoiding material long-term damage. The government’s position will, however, need to change for that to happen. With a reasonable [degree of certainty] I expect about five per cent of GDP to be lost over the next ten years. But there will be a major industry in establishing what the effect of Brexit was, and, as always, there will be no definitive answer.
 
With all this talk about differing US and UK food standards, our Home Office does not issue warnings to be cautious when consuming American foodstuffs when visiting on holiday. So whats the problem?
 
With all this talk about differing US and UK food standards, our Home Office does not issue warnings to be cautious when consuming American foodstuffs when visiting on holiday. So whats the problem?

Lol.

https://www.lifehack.org/289935/4-health-reasons-for-why-american-milk-banned-europe

http://americannutritionassociation.org/toolsandresources/milk-america’s-health-problem

Just read that and consider yourself grateful it's banned. Australia and NZ have also banned it.

You can drink it for a temporary period when on holiday but long term would you?

We have issues with Russia and are NATO members yet we can travel to Russia and Russians can come to the UK.

Travel advice is just that travel advice implying other things from it isn't a sound argument.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top