It's you that's stupid, not the dogs. Dogs are unbiased. You think the McCanns are innocent - but a dog doesn't care because it doesn't know what innocent or guilt is.
If you were in a foreign land in a dodgy hotel that collapsed and trapped your kids and rescue dogs were available to help locate them, would you say:
"Yes please."
Or
"Nah they'll only wag and bark and go looking for sausages".
So which is it?
Actually Joe, maybe it's time to stop being respectful, and react to your comments in kind.... you are a fookin knob.
A dog is not unbiased... put it in front of two people, one with a sausage, and one with a housebrick.. the dog will favour the sausage. Plus dogs are stupid, that's why not many dogs are barristers.
I've had many stances during this harrowing case, my current stance in NOT that the McCanns are innocent, it is let's put effort in to find Maddie, and then look at the evidence to punish the guilty... whether that be a spanish paedo ring, the McCanns, or you Joe.
Joe a debate is an evolution of facts you share and learn from and formulate a better argument.... yet you put your stick in the sand and just shout louder - that's not an act of an intelligent person is it Joe?
I agree with most of what you say but would like to pull you up on a few minor points.
1. Are you saying barristers are clever?
2. You have used two words in the same sentence that are not compatible; "intelligent" & "Joe"