And they said Corbyn was a terrorist sympathiser..
- Thread starter banjodeano
- Start date
- Status
It worked.
Perhaps he bought a Czech with him.......'Mrs May, could you pass this onto agent Cob' 
I saw Commie McDonnell on breakfast tv this morning, he refused to condemn Russian involvement in the recent Salisbury spy killing job. I suppose McDonnell was worried about his Czech for appearances on Russia today
I saw Commie McDonnell on breakfast tv this morning, he refused to condemn Russian involvement in the recent Salisbury spy killing job. I suppose McDonnell was worried about his Czech for appearances on Russia today
HEY....Go start your own thread if you wanna slag Labour off, this is for the vile weak and wobbly terrorist sympathiserPerhaps he bought a Czech with him.......'Mrs May, could you pass this onto agent Cob'
I saw Commie McDonnell on breakfast tv this morning, he refused to condemn Russian involvement in the recent Salisbury spy killing job. I suppose McDonnell was worried about his Czech for appearances on Russia today
HEY....Go start your own thread if you wanna slag Labour off, this is for the vile weak and wobbly terrorist sympathiser
- Joined
- 7 Jan 2010
- Messages
- 14,189
- Reaction score
- 4,200
- Country
Did someone mention Tony Bliar ?
- Joined
- 28 Apr 2004
- Messages
- 8,373
- Reaction score
- 980
- Country
Left handed handshake? or is the pic reversed?
- Joined
- 7 Jan 2010
- Messages
- 14,189
- Reaction score
- 4,200
- Country
Whenever I see a pic of Theresa May I cant help thinking of Gerald Scarfe.
- Joined
- 28 Apr 2004
- Messages
- 8,373
- Reaction score
- 980
- Country
Or I heard today Skeletors grandmother
The stupidly thick amongst us decry May as a "terrorist sympathiser".
The more cognitive realise that May, being the Prime Minister, is just doing what every PM from every party, has done before her and dealt with the Saudis in the interests of the UK.
That's in the UK's interests not against the UK's interests. There is a difference.
I await the pictures of May cosying up to the IRA, or perhaps a YouTube video of May socialising with the IRA, or maybe an MP3 of may singing Republican songs against the British Government. Perhaps something of May plotting and scheming against the UK people, or passing information to or helping foreign powers? Something with May opposing every single foreign policy and position and belittling the UK?
The more cognitive realise that May, being the Prime Minister, is just doing what every PM from every party, has done before her and dealt with the Saudis in the interests of the UK.
That's in the UK's interests not against the UK's interests. There is a difference.
I await the pictures of May cosying up to the IRA, or perhaps a YouTube video of May socialising with the IRA, or maybe an MP3 of may singing Republican songs against the British Government. Perhaps something of May plotting and scheming against the UK people, or passing information to or helping foreign powers? Something with May opposing every single foreign policy and position and belittling the UK?
Let's not confuse acting in the UK's interest with not sympathising with terrorists.
Particularly in the context of the UK's history of foreign invasion, slavery, concentration camps, massacres of civilians, collusion with kidnapping and torture, supplying weapons and training to dictators who use them to terrorise both their own populations and that of countries around them, the UK's continued unlawful development of new WMD's etc, I would suggest that it really doesn't make sense to suggest that acting in the UK's interests means that you're not colluding with terrorists.
I await the pictures of May condemning the vast amounts of UK taxpayers money which ended up as bribes in the pockets of Saudi royalty, the reports of May condemning the killing of uncounted numbers of civilians by UK forces in Iraq, together with the subsequent rise in anger, hatred and terrorism, condemning the Saudi air strikes in Yemen, given the overwhelming evidence of repeated breaches of international humanitarian law.
Particularly in the context of the UK's history of foreign invasion, slavery, concentration camps, massacres of civilians, collusion with kidnapping and torture, supplying weapons and training to dictators who use them to terrorise both their own populations and that of countries around them, the UK's continued unlawful development of new WMD's etc, I would suggest that it really doesn't make sense to suggest that acting in the UK's interests means that you're not colluding with terrorists.
I await the pictures of May condemning the vast amounts of UK taxpayers money which ended up as bribes in the pockets of Saudi royalty, the reports of May condemning the killing of uncounted numbers of civilians by UK forces in Iraq, together with the subsequent rise in anger, hatred and terrorism, condemning the Saudi air strikes in Yemen, given the overwhelming evidence of repeated breaches of international humanitarian law.
Last edited:
Brexit - Ireland/NI border - Good Friday agreement, ring any bells?
Corbyn meeting IRA just days after Brighton bombing.
Corbyn refuses to condemn IRA
Ring any bells?
- Status
Similar threads
- Deleted member 294929
- General Discussion
