I've clearly said that you need to address the cause as well as the effect.If you address the effects without addressing the cause, then you are exacerbating the situation, not reducing it.
Moreover, if your addressing the effects increases the very problem that caused the situation in the first place, that policy is not only counter-productive, it is perceived as doubling-down on the real cause.
When high profile BAME people suffer from perceived racial profiling, they have the opportunity and the means to highlight the issue, the cause.
When John Smith, who is an unknown, suffers such discrimination, he does not have the means to highlight his problem. Also, he perceives it as 'the norm' because he's had to endure it all his life, and he doesn't see anything changing any time soon.
Your criticism of high profile BAME people taking the opportunity to highlight their treatment is not addressing the real problem, it is attempting to shift the blame.
Dawn Butler didn't address the cause, she didn't highlight their actual treatment, she highlighted the image she wanted to portray.
I do blame Dawn Butler for pouring petrol onto a fire. I also believe that the black community has to acknowledge that the problems it has with the police are not purely down to the police. I don't think that's attempting to shift the blame, its highlighting the reality of the situation. Until we acknowledge that its a two sided problem that the police and government cannot fix on their own, its not going to get better.