Did you read the Internal Market Bill, part 5 para 40 onwards, para 45 appears to be the killer.
https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/58-01/0177/20177.pdf
Talking of breaking the law...
- Thread starter ellal
- Start date
Did you read the Internal Market Bill, part 5 para 40 onwards, para 45 appears to be the killer.
https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/58-01/0177/20177.pdf
Sponsored Links
Filly has fallen for yet another Boris dead cat
its all bolox Old Bean....Boris is getting ready to hide in a fridge....again
The EU leaders appear to have fallen for it as well, they're having emergency meetings as we speak.
- Joined
- 9 May 2020
- Messages
- 7,395
- Reaction score
- 136
- Country
No, did you read the NI Protocol?
When the government's own minister admits the Bill will break international law, who am I to disagree.
You should.
Sponsored Links
- Joined
- 9 May 2020
- Messages
- 7,395
- Reaction score
- 136
- Country
I don't need to, I'll take the advice of those I trust. It ain't Boris!
D
Deleted2797112
.
Last edited by a moderator:
Mitch here you are busy taking time to post that I should "get a life"....gee dont you spot the irony
the reality is, it winds you up
If that makes you happy I am genuinely pleased for you, honestly. I'm not wound up Notch. I pity you.
Boris is on the ropes, he is so desperate he has to play silly games.
Reason?.....to deflect from the reality: he is stuck between a rock and a hard place.
The EU will protect the integrity of the Single Market, simples
Well, looks like this afternoons crunch talks went well. EU bods are hopping and given us till the end of the month to backtrack on the Internal Markets Bill.
Govey told 'em to do one.
Cue notchy now for the next 4 weeks forecasting boris will back down.
Furthermore, it doesn't break International Law, thanks to a precedent set in a recent court case brought by your very own Gina Miller.
“treaty obligations only become binding to the extent that they are enshrined in domestic legislation. Whether to enact or repeal legislation, and the content of that legislation, is for Parliament and Parliament alone. This principle was recently approved unanimously by the Supreme Court in R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5.”
*snigger*
“treaty obligations only become binding to the extent that they are enshrined in domestic legislation. Whether to enact or repeal legislation, and the content of that legislation, is for Parliament and Parliament alone. This principle was recently approved unanimously by the Supreme Court in R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5.”
*snigger*
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 14,266
- Reaction score
- 2,103
- Country
I don't think that is 100% Correct..
Under the WA, the CJEU will no longer have general jurisdiction over the UK in relation to any acts that take place on or after 1 January 2021. Whether it will have any role to play in terms of oversight of any future relationship agreements between the UK and the EU will depend on what is negotiated.
The Political Declaration agreed by the UK and the EU, only makes clear that insofar as the ‘future relationship’ contains concepts of EU law, disputes about those concepts will have to be referred to the CJEU. This must be in a process similar to that set up by Article 174 of the WA, in which the CJEU can offer a binding interpretation of EU law.
https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/brexit-next-steps-the-court-of-justice-of-the-eu-and-the-uk/
No deal would question the concept of "Future Relationship" as defined.
Well, looks like this afternoons crunch talks went well. EU bods are hopping and given us till the end of the month to backtrack on the Internal Markets Bill.
Govey told 'em to do one.
How embarrassing for Boris and brexiteers, he will end being taken to court by the ECJ.
It's the 10th now dummy.
Sponsored Links
Similar threads
