...we choose to 'prioritise...'
the vaccine, which is given to reduce the risk of illness and death, will be given first to those most likely to suffer illness and death.
Tell me why you think that's wrong.
...we choose to 'prioritise...'
So basically (if you believe the hype of course) we choose to 'prioritise' the most useless members of society downwards first?
(apart from of course health care workers)
If this 'virus' is apparently as bad as we are being led to believe then those who are able to keep society running should be prioritised...So would you include your Parents/Grandparents (assuming they are still alive), into the useless members of society sector.
I would suggest realistic, rather than being the ignorant individual you areWhat an uncaring nasty individual you are.
Would you prioritise the elderly over those who are keeping the country running?
Yes or no?
IF?If this 'virus' is apparently as bad as we are being led to believe then those who are able to keep society running should be prioritised...
As I said, you are an ignorant individual...Ah the classic "Have you stopped beating your wife, yes or no"
The vast majority of people keeping the country running are in the least affected groups, so do not require the Vaccine so urgently.
So again, are your parents/grandparents useless members of society?
Proof please...
You are inferring that this 'virus' is as 'apparently as bad as we are being led to believe' by questioning my word 'if'...Of what?
(but just so you're clear, less useful than me, and I'm less useful than my kids)
Ah, no.You are inferring that this 'virus' is as 'apparently as bad as we are being led to believe' by questioning my word 'if'...
I happen to believe it is not as virulent/fatal as we are being told, so I'm asking for your proof as to the contrary...
It's very simple
You are inferring that this 'virus' is as 'apparently as bad as we are being led to believe' by questioning my word 'if'...
I happen to believe it is not as virulent/fatal as we are being told, so I'm asking for your proof as to the contrary...
It's very simple
My apologies, I read your post as the other way...Ah, no.
I was querying your use of 'if' - in that I am also sure it is not.
You've got it correct...Your logic dictates that once you are happy with the vaccine, you will give it your kids first, who don't need it.
Then you will take it before your parents, who are less useful than you, what a caring individual.
And I'm the ignorant one.
Based on what?I happen to believe it is not as virulent/fatal as we are being told