D
durhamplumber
Who knows more..you or the judges?When was the trial?
Did I miss it?
Did you miss it?
What was the verdict?
What was the charge?
Where was it held?
Bye Shammina ...
- Thread starter ^woody^
- Start date
Sponsored Links
D
durhamplumber
Who knows more..you or the judges?When was the trial?
Did I miss it?
Did you miss it?
What was the verdict?
What was the charge?
Where was it held?
Has UK ditched the basis of law in UK?
Obviously not because the case went all the way to the supreme court.
You can always send her an invitation to live with you in France if you feel she has been so hard done by.
- Joined
- 9 May 2020
- Messages
- 7,395
- Reaction score
- 136
- Country
On whether she should be allowed to present her case to the court. A basic Human Right enshrined in the Human Rights Act.
She has been denied this. Can a Home Secretary unilaterally deny people their Human Rights?
Should the courts uphold such a decision to deny someone their basic Human Rights?
The case had nothing to do with the grounds for the stripping of her citizenship, nor anything to do with a criminal trial.
Sponsored Links
How many human rights did she deny whilst part of Isis?
The stripping of her citizenship was already heard in court and deemed legal wasn't it
https://www.freemovement.org.uk/sha...ess-argument-against-citizenship-deprivation/
- Joined
- 9 May 2020
- Messages
- 7,395
- Reaction score
- 136
- Country
Then she should be put on trial for those crimes. But the Home Secretary has bypassed that process.
He has, in as much, declared her to be a criminal and denied her access to justice.
He did this unilaterally and without due process of any judicial system.
I think she lost those rights when she started cutting off people's heads and blowing up innocent children
- Joined
- 9 May 2020
- Messages
- 7,395
- Reaction score
- 136
- Country
Happy with that.
- Joined
- 9 May 2020
- Messages
- 7,395
- Reaction score
- 136
- Country
And if she can't, she is stateless. Left to her own devices in a refugee camp for the rest of her natural life.
Might as well bring back capital punishment.
She's a security risk.how ever tbh I don’t quite see how this girl presents a security risk to the UK if she did come back
I don't think she's got the brains to be anything worse than a shoplifter. But that's beside the point.
IMO she should not be allowed back in the UK she can stay were she is or go to Bangladesh
how ever tbh I don’t quite see how this girl presents a security risk to the UK if she did come back
The security risk is that she still has many contacts in the terrorism underworld, she would be easily re-recruited in those circles and will likely be at the centre of a re-emergence of Islamic terrorism in the UK.
We can say we'll have mi5 on her tail permanently, but we all know that doesn't really stop them, most likely MI5/6 will lose contact somehow or other and won't be known till she resurfaces.
The UK government appear to be quite insistent they have evidence she is not a changed person enough to fight for her to not be allowed back into the UK.
And if she can't, she is stateless. Left to her own devices in a refugee camp for the rest of her natural life.
Might as well bring back capital punishment.
She's a security risk.
I don't think she's got the brains to be anything worse than a shoplifter. But that's beside the point.
how is she a security risk
IMO she should not be allowed back in the UK she can stay were she is or go to Bangladesh
how ever tbh I don’t quite see how this girl presents a security risk to the UK if she did come back
Hopefully she won't be allowed back and we won't find out.
- Joined
- 9 May 2020
- Messages
- 7,395
- Reaction score
- 136
- Country
It circumvents the justification of a constitution and government involving and including the judicial system.
Sponsored Links
