Woman and Sex, means biological sex.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Like a terrorist cell, himmy has sleeper accounts, that lay dormant.

It’s rather pathetic, he could just tone down the crazy and join in with the other forum idiots.
I did think that, but it would be really, really pathetic.

No one is that sad…
 
Most people with actual DSDs prefer the word "Disorder" because they feel it better describes their situation. Also, they don't like being dragged into the trans terminology battle.
Please provide your source for this evidence.
 
I respect women to have their own safe places more.
It doesn’t do that though.
Yes, we now have transmen using the female single sex shared spaces. Transwomen using the male single sex shared spaces.
Butch lesbians being challenged for their right to use the female single sex shared spaces.
And discussions about asking transmen and transwomen to share the same spaces.
Or we need Female only, male only, transmen only and transwomen only single sex shared spaces.

Or gender neutral spaces.

So we have a choice of providing individual gender neutral spaces, or four different single-sex shared spaces.
 
And seeing as I didn’t mention a name but you’ve replied twice….
You've made several such comments in several threads.
It's been obvious who you've been referring to.
Such fantasies occur because you are unable to participate in sensible, intelligent, respectful debates. So you resort to character assassinations.
But that's OK. You are allowed to invent conspiracy theories, and to push them as hard as you like. It confirms and reaffirms your inability to participate in the debate.
And others are allowed to believe your conspiracy theories, which they tend to do if your fantasies align with their own fears and shortcomings.
 
You've made several such comments in several threads.
It's been obvious who you've been referring to.
Such fantasies occur because you are unable to participate in sensible, intelligent, respectful debates. So you resort to character assassinations.
But that's OK. You are allowed to invent conspiracy theories, and to push them as hard as you like. It confirms and reaffirms your inability to participate in the debate.
And others are allowed to believe your conspiracy theories, which they tend to do if your fantasies align with their own fears and shortcomings.
Can you point me in the direction where I’ve mentioned you please ?

You’ve replied like I have mentioned you, but I haven’t.

So “have I touched a nerve” old boy

Oh, and you’ve only been here since Tuesday, so how many times have I actually mentioned you ? None id say….
 
You've made several such comments in several threads.
It's been obvious who you've been referring to.
Such fantasies occur because you are unable to participate in sensible, intelligent, respectful debates. So you resort to character assassinations.
But that's OK. You are allowed to invent conspiracy theories, and to push them as hard as you like. It confirms and reaffirms your inability to participate in the debate.
And others are allowed to believe your conspiracy theories, which they tend to do if your fantasies align with their own fears and shortcomings.
I’ve made 35 posts since Tuesday, none mention you!

So it’s not a conspiracy theory as you claim, but you have lied to cover up outing your self.

Oh how we laugh
 
I’ve made 35 posts since Tuesday, none mention you!
So it’s not a conspiracy theory as you claim, but you have lied to cover up outing your self.
Oh how we laugh
And 6 of them have been pushing your conspiracy theory.
I'm not interested in you trying to turn the discussion about your theory.
It's about the recent SC decision.
So try and keep your contributions on topic.
Or start a new thread.
If you are incapable of doing that you are free to continue trolling.
Two forum members with very similar posting styles!
There’s something fishy going on….

What gets me is one has an older account, but only just started posting recently.
Can the site owner change account opening dates I wonder

I did think that, but it would be really, really pathetic.
No one is that sad…

Touched a nerve have I ?
And seeing as I didn’t mention a name but you’ve replied twice….

Can you point me in the direction where I’ve mentioned you please ?
You’ve replied like I have mentioned you, but I haven’t.
So “have I touched a nerve” old boy
Oh, and you’ve only been here since Tuesday, so how many times have I actually mentioned you ? None id say….
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top