Watch the following. These people seem to be perfectly fine with books containing explicit content being available to children?!?
I couldn't believe what I was watching i.e. the content of what they were reading out, and then to assert it's fine for kids to have access to this stuff.Just the militant, progressive wing of the anything goes liberal movement. All professional anarchists and arsey trouble makers.
Just another symptom of National decline.Watch the following. These people seem to be perfectly fine with books containing explicit content being available to children?!?
I remember the importers of Swedish sex films tried to get around the censor by claiming the films weren't pornographic they were eductional.
1. Watch the video.Define children.
There aren't many (any?) generally available books I'd ban 16 year olds from reading.
Which books is this person reading from?
Did you learn much?
Yeah, so with the exception of the character who fantasies about BDSM, which we only have out of context (do the other characters then say 'thats pretty ****ed up?'), none of that induces a moral panic.1. Watch the video.
And even if you consider it fake news, follow step 2.
2. Read this: https://www.city-journal.org/article/have-you-looked-inside-any-of-these-books
You'd get on well with those in the video ...Yeah, so with the exception of the character who fantasies about BDSM, which we only have out of context (do the other characters then say 'thats pretty ****ed up?'), none of that induces a moral panic.
For back story some of those books have been on reading lists for 12+ and have since been removed or moved to older groups.
Do you know how explicit sexual descriptions get in teenage reading content? This isn't notably different, except it covers LGBT content which we know makes some people uncomfortable.
Some dodgy hair styles.Did you learn much?
People under pension age?You'd get on well with those in the video ...
You don't have kids - right?I couldn't believe what I was watching i.e. the content of what they were reading out, and then to assert it's fine for kids to have access to this stuff.
Twisted and perverse comes to mind.