Nah: some just like to give the impression that they're edgy, not "sheeple", free thinkers.
Climate Change
- Thread starter Highway Man
- Start date
Nah: some just like to give the impression that they're edgy, not "sheeple", free thinkers.
D
Deleted member 317777
They do!
They are the sheeple though, taken comfort in conspiracy theories.
It's a moron thing.
Its worth reminding that the current conversation is about denso making up the hundreds of thousands of climate scientists figure.
Not really. You are just (desperately) deflecting. Give it up boyo, you are out of your depth. Your oft' regurgitated conspiracy waffle is pitiful.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,984
- Reaction score
- 3,069
- Country
Leave him to it, he is trolling.
Always. This section is infected with them.
I thought it was about you not being able to find your way through a spread sheet. 88,000 is near enough.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,984
- Reaction score
- 3,069
- Country
88,000 peer reviewed articles/studies with multiple authors, many over ten.
That’s hundreds of thousands then
But what is a climate scientist. How many of those papers were only tangentially related to climate research. And how many repeat authors are there. It would be strange for a scientist to only write one paper over a period of ten years. The Quora discussion I linked to is actually very interesting. The participants estimate anything from a few hundred scientists to perhaps twenty five thousand, depending on how you define a climate scientist.
Last edited:
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,984
- Reaction score
- 3,069
- Country
Probably quite a few, but he has the names and the details of the title/publications, he could delve deeper if he wants to.
By that logic then, a denier who produces reams of drivel is less credible than someone who produces only one or two bits of "research"?
To me if the research is produced by academics with a track record of published work, in a university or similarly independent research setting, and acknowledged (peer reviewed) by other academics/scientists with similar background, that is a reasonable sign of independence, Certainly more MAGA Creationists on X or fake pseudo scientists on Youtube.
