
A new tax from labour? Surely not.The beeb are about to get a massive lifeline from Labour. Apparently, rather than make them address falling demand for their service they are thinking of scrapping the optional licence fee and making it mandatory via general tax.
Nice free ride
Would you prefer to have a nationwide broadcast system totally based on advertising revenue and run by those who choose what you should believe?Nice free ride

The bbc do a lot more than news and the number of people opting out their content of funding them is increasing.
Moving to a national funding model removes consumer choice.
It also gives them unfair competitive advantage over the independents


Interesting non fact there......The beeb are about to get a massive lifeline from Labour. Apparently, rather than make them address falling demand for their service they are thinking of scrapping the optional licence fee and making it mandatory via general tax.
Nice free ride
You might think what they produce is carp, but others disagree...I'd support splitting them off in to a core service - News + Radio and a subscription service - all the cr@p content they produce.

The argument was that it was no different than being eligible to vote. The cost of running elections is shared by everyone even if you don't voteInteresting non fact there......
The truth...
The BBC will not be funded from general taxation if the TV licence fee is abolished, the culture secretary has said.
Lisa Nandy told BBC Breakfast the licence fee was "deeply regressive" and that she was thinking "quite radically and creatively" about alternatives.
However, they do not include using money from general taxes to fund the BBC, because that could open up the broadcaster to interference from politicians who would hold the purse strings, she said.
Nandy did not rule out a subscription model for the BBC, but said there was "a whole range" of other possible options.
She said the government was "determined to grip this, and I think there is a genuine sense out there in the public that the licence fee was built for a different era".
Nandy has started negotiations with the BBC about the corporation's funding after its current royal charter expires in 2027.
The important bit ..
However, they do not include using money from general taxes to fund the BBC, because that could open up the broadcaster to interference from politicians who would hold the purse strings, she said.


and you are happy to pay for it, like I do for my Netflix subscription.You might think what they produce is carp, but others disagree...
I don't miss it because I terminated my subscription 5 years ago.And making the BBC a 'core service' is missing the point...
The BBC caters for all, not just the easily led commercially challenged 'audience'!
And the BBC have always been innovators, whether it be in technology or promoting minority interests...
So I ask you this as an example...
Given the state of women's sport attendance figures a decade ago, why are stadiums now selling out?
I'll answer that for you...
It's because the BBC decided to give similar coverage to women's competitions as they do to men's...
And it was the same with diversity sport, which commercial companies have now finally cottoned onto...
Because they saw an opportunity created by the BBC...
You'll only miss it when we all lose it!
At the price the licence fee is a bargain for the wide range of services it provides...and you are happy to pay for it, like I do for my Netflix subscription.