Britain was right to vote for Brexit...

[Roger928]

so you don't condemn all terrorists.

but Corbyn does.

So I guess he should be criticising you, rather than the other way round.

If I was with corbyn and he gave an answer like "I condemn all terrorists" I would spit in his face.
For the coniving, hypocritical liar that he is.

 

[JohnD]

that's because you're full of hate.

have you got a job on the daily wail yet?

 

[Roger928]

that's because you're full of hate.

No. Its because he would deserve it.

 

[JohnD]

why are you right-wing extremists always full of rage and hate?

 

[Roger928]

why are you right-wing extremists always full of rage and hate?

Why are you left wing extremists always full of rage and hate?

 

[JohnD]

hahaha!

 

[Notch7]

notch has been complaining at people who don't condemn selected terrorism using words of his choice.

but he won't condemn all terrorism himself.

Woody is the same. And roger.

Very sleazy.

Notch isn't addressing the topic of this thread either.

JohnD refuses to explain why Jeremy Corbyn will not explicitly condemn IRA terrorists. Perhaps JohnD is unable to condemn the IRA himself, for reasons he has yet to explain.

JohnD seems to think when Jeremy Corbyn is asked if he condemns the IRA, that the answer given: 'I condemn all terrorists' is an acceptable answer that requires no further explanation.

It would seem JohnD is refusing to accept that Jeremy Corbyn's historical relationship with senior IRA figures and IRA ideology, needs transparency and explanation. If Corbyn has nothing to hide, why the need to avoid a straight answer to a very reasonable question.

Why did MI5 open a file on Corbyn? Its all very sleazy.

 

[Roger928]

All very sleazy indeed...
Poor old ira symphathiser corbyn and poor old johnd his loyal supporter.....
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...d-file-jeremy-corbyn-amid-concerns-ira-links/

"I'm happy to commemorate all those who died fighting for an independent Ireland"
Jeremy corbyn

That was at a meeting of the wolftone society where terrorist supporter corbyn paid tribute to the ira men who launched a bombing and gun attack on a police station in Loughgall.
Its all very sleazy.
One of the men corbyn paid tribute to was Jim Lynagh. Otherwise known as the "executioner" who police believe killed as many as 40 innocent people.

 

[noseall]

Why did MI5 open a file on Corbyn?

Dunno? Why what happened? Did they close it again?

 

[Brigadier]

Because JC doesn't consider the IRA as terrorists?

"I condemn all terrorists" is then correct in his own mind, but not the political suicide of a straight "I won't condemn the IRA, because I supported their cause, and don't consider them terrorists"?

Edited for greater clarity.

 

[^woody^]

so you don't condemn all terrorists.

but Corbyn does.

Has he apologised to the families of UK citizens murdered by the IRA, or other victims of their terrorist acts, or the UK people generally for his support for the IRA and his sucking up to the IRA leaders and his socialising with the terrorist murderers?

It's that simple. Has he apologised and acknowledge his treacherous despicable acts against the UK? Has he?

No squirming around with your pithy sidestepping and distraction replies. Has he apologised for his support of the IRA and not the UK people?

 

[JohnD]

you already told us that you don't condemn all terrorism, woody, so you own no moral outrage here.

 

[^woody^]

you already told us that you don't condemn all terrorism, woody, so you own no moral outrage here.

And yet I don't seek to be the prime minister of the people my friends tried and are still trying to murder.

My morals are as intact as your ignorance, and my argument better than your ineptitude.

 

[JohnD]

none of us know which are the terrorists you support, so we can't comment on them.

But you already said you don't condemn all terrorism so obviously you have some favourites.

You've given up the right to criticise other people.

It's tedious to see you right-wing extremists keep trotting out your long-discredited smears in obedience to your party line. As Emily said, it's b***ocks.

 

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

Brexit will achieve what Sinn Fein have been campaigning for.

If there is no deal, and we crash out of the EU, the chances of a either a hard border, or a referendum on the subject of re-uniting the Island of Ireland, becomes a real possibility.
The way things are going, it looks like we will crash out, possibly at 2300 hrs on 29 March 2019, with all the implications on tariffs, borders etc incurred.
That will mean that a hard border will be required in Ireland. UK will blame EU for it, and vice-versa.
But the people of Ireland will undoubtedly campaign for a referendum on the subject of re-unification.
Would the UK government allow it, knowing the inevitable outcome? They could not refuse it because it is written into the Good Friday Agreement. Or would that be ripped up, blaming it on EU also?