Holy Smoke

When I gave examples of that sort of behaviour to back up what I said about getting drunk not being universally socially acceptable, you disgreed - your response was



If you're going to attack someone for saying that an activity is not socially acceptable, that can only be because you disagree with them, and disagree so strongly that you write things like this



If you are that strongly opposed to the idea that those sorts of behaviours are unacceptable, it cannot be anything other than you think they are acceptable.

If you don't think they are acceptable you wouldn't call me a party pooper, or say that I roll my eyes at anyone enjoying themselves and that I'm not normal, for saying that they aren't acceptable.
No time for you I am afraid. I need to get out there and help those in need.
 
Good tune. My rave days were 1991-1994. I knocked it all on the head then. Good days, I did what I did.
Same as me, although I kept going until the late 90s as there were still some great clubs in the southwest.
Never saw any violence back then, except for the odd p1sshead.
 
Same as me, although I kept going until the late 90s as there were still some great clubs in the southwest.
Never saw any violence back then, except for the odd p1sshead.
I had a little relapse in the mid/late 90’s in st. Ives. Great days
 
Sad, isn't it.

I’d appreciate your advise on this thread please

 
He will never stop. He is Himmy and he is indestructible! Many have fallen by the wayside.
And yet you have another name in here, as does another "new" poster.

You really shouldn't criticise for others doing the same as you
 
No time for you I am afraid. I need to get out there and help those in need.

That's OK - you can explain when you get back how attacking and abusing someone for saying "X is not acceptable" does not mean that you think it is.
 
Not right now.

I'm predicting never.

Just like, for example, in the "Flag Dynamics" tread, when presented with irrefutable evidence of your falsehoods, then in a display of your commitment to politeness and civility you'll either double down and repeat them, or just walk away, leaving the falsehoods to stand.
 
I'm predicting never.

Just like, for example, in the "Flag Dynamics" tread, when presented with irrefutable evidence of your falsehoods, then in a display of your commitment to politeness and civility you'll either double down and repeat them, or just walk away, leaving the falsehoods to stand.
No idea what you are talking about.
 
I'm predicting never.

Just like, for example, in the "Flag Dynamics" tread, when presented with irrefutable evidence of your falsehoods, then in a display of your commitment to politeness and civility you'll either double down and repeat them, or just walk away, leaving the falsehoods to stand.
I am way too busy saving lives here.
 
No idea what you are talking about.


 
Back
Top