Hot Air

[motorbiking]

@Notch7 It’s not about if he was wrong or right, it’s about saying someone is dishonest or lying. You had no grounds to call him a liar.

 

[Roy Bloom]

It’s not about if he was wrong or right, it’s about saying someone is dishonest or lying. You had no grounds to call him a liar.

I didn't. You're making false allegations.
That's as bad as calling someone a liar when they're not.

 

[motorbiking]

Wasn’t aimed at you. I posted before refreshing the thread.

 

[gant]

Wasn’t aimed at you. I posted before refreshing the thread.

Paranoia for you.

 

[Roy Bloom]

Paranoia for you.

It's normal for motorbiking to be a little vague with his responses.
It's at least the second time he's accused someone of being disingenuine without specifying who.

I usually start typing at the beginning of the post, and finish at the end.
I don't add the beginning, after I've finished and posted the rest.

 

[gant]

It's normal for motorbiking to be a little vague with his responses.
It's at least the second time he's accused someone of being disingenuine without specifying who.

Your saying your a bit thick, it was obvious who it was directed at.

 

[Odds]

You do like to twist people's comments into something they're absolutely not. You did it to me, when I questioned if something had really happened, and you twisted it into, "So you think they deserved it"!


Your tactic of debate is dishonest and immature.
I suspect that is because you have difficulty with the fallibility of your arguments.

It's his idea of discussion. You'll get used to it.

 

[Roy Bloom]

It's his idea of discussion. You'll get used to it.

Your saying your a bit thick,

It's quite common on this forum for some to misinterpret what was said, hence the frequent poor quality of genuine debate.

 

[Roy Bloom]

it was obvious who it was directed at.

That'll be why motorbiking felt the need, belatedly, to address it to someone specific.

 

[gant]

It's quite common on this forum for some to misinterpret what was said, hence the frequent poor quality of genuine debate.

Was it you who was rolling round laughing at saying you can't eat the manor.

 

[Roy Bloom]

Was it you who was rolling round laughing at saying you can't eat the manor.

It was also me who posted this:

Ambiguity:
Flying planes can be dangerous.
The fish is ready to eat.

Grammar: Eats shoots and leaves.

Spelling:
rouge

Edit: and 'ounce' upon a time.

It illustrates how ambiguity, grammar, spelling and other mistakes can change the meaning of sentences, or make them appear gibberish, even gantish.
Or cause confusion, as motorbiking's vaguely addressed post did, and then gave subsequent cause for the last round of nonsense posts from you.
A page full of nonense now.

Edit: The correct saying is "manna from heaven".
Manna is a type of bread. Manor is a large house.

 

[motorbiking]

Oh dear. I seem to have triggered the neurodivergence again.

 

[Roy Bloom]

Oh dear. I seem to have triggered the neurodivergence again.

Don't be hard on gant.