But i'm interested in finding out how far this human rights nonsense has to go before you see the stupidity of it.
Human Rights
- Thread starter cozycats
- Start date
But i'm interested in finding out how far this human rights nonsense has to go before you see the stupidity of it.
Sponsored Links
L
longdogs
He never will and is not alone. There are plenty of people around that are happy to see the total demise of common sense. For all we know BA could be a terrorist himself, a sleeper, who knows? It certainly seems that way.
Isn't wearing a tag a condition of not being kept in custody?
Although not (yet) proven guilty, this person is strongly suspected of being a terrorist. In that case, should he not be monitored?
He's playing a game. He knows that having agents keeping him under surveillance is a lot more expensive that his wearing a tag.
They all know the loopholes and take full advantage of them.
He's playing a game. He knows that having agents keeping him under surveillance is a lot more expensive that his wearing a tag.
They all know the loopholes and take full advantage of them.
Sponsored Links
[QUOTE="squeaky, post: 3407914, member: 33519"
exactly
if you keep your nose clean in the correct areas you wont come onto the radar the survalance is only as good as what they pick up
i could indeed be the evil one under the radar
often the will grasp at straws arresting and hoping to gain evidence in the meantime often falling flat on there faces
often they will miss the "quiet ones" who are the real danger as they can do far far more danger as they are unchecked
exactly
if you keep your nose clean in the correct areas you wont come onto the radar the survalance is only as good as what they pick up
i could indeed be the evil one under the radar
often the will grasp at straws arresting and hoping to gain evidence in the meantime often falling flat on there faces
often they will miss the "quiet ones" who are the real danger as they can do far far more danger as they are unchecked
Trouble is squeaky, one day they will wake up and wonder where it all went wrong, secretly knowing it was all their fault.
They'll have to live with that.
And your point is?
Any such action by the security services / authorities is deemed "suspect", and therefore in your opinion should be rescinded?
Isn't it high time the human rights of victims got the same respect, those of the (alleged) perpetrators seem to get? It seems to me that in many cases, crims (or their lawyers) always play the human rights card and the same human rights that victims were supposed to enjoy, had been infringed in he first instance.
i think you have lost the plot ??i say they dont always use powers exactly as they should
and you extrapolate "Any such action by the security services / authorities is deemed "suspect", and therefore in your opinion should be rescinded" ???
A judge originally thought that a tag was appropriate.
a judge also thought that the tpim (sic?) still stands.
Presumably, they had access to more info than GD.
You either accept the rule of law, fallibility and all, or you don't.
My plot is nicely intact, thank you
D
Deleted member 63160
I can only assume that the apologists on this forum are muslims, married to muslims or just so left logic goes out the window??
you tried to take what i said and add several layers to come to a different conclusion when what i said was clear
my loosing the plot comment was only aimed at the missinterpritation off my comment and nothing else
on your other point a judge overturned the need to wear a tracking device
Last edited:
Sponsored Links
