Ah, I see. That's obviously very different from what Risteard suggested - namely that it was deliberately omitted from BS 7671 because hearsay had told him that BS 7288 forbade the use of devices to that Standard as providers of 'additional protection' unless there was another upstream RCD device.I meant an error in BS 7671 531.3.6 in that it doesn't explicitly allow BS 7288, perhaps?
Kind Regards, John