Race report. UK a model for other white countries

Absolutely because it takes away their power too. And no doubt no matter the colour of the people involved in the report, they're all racist (or some new fandango descriptive alluding to them being blind to racism)

What a surprise, Festive the white man says racism doesn't exist :ROFLMAO:
 
Sponsored Links
I’ll accept your deflection as an apology.
Well done.

Your inability to answer my questions proves you are wrong.

I will ask you again: "how does comparisons with other countries prove racism doesn't exist here"?

Come on stop being a coward and answer
 
I didn’t say racism doesn’t exist. I just asked you to name a country doing more than us.

Can you not read? Are you that thick?
I have never said that racism doesn’t exist.
If I have, show me & I will apologise to you.
I just asked a question that you seem to keep avoiding. Man up.
 
I didn’t say racism doesn’t exist. I just asked you to name a country doing more than us.
Could you show me where you answered ?

Thank for admitting your question has nothing to do with racism in the UK.

Finallly you admit your whataboutery. :ROFLMAO:
 
Sponsored Links
Can you not read? Are you that thick?
I have never said that racism doesn’t exist.
If I have, show me & I will apologise to you.
I just asked a question that you seem to keep avoiding. Man up.

Exactly you didn't say racism doesn't exist....you are busy trying to deflect away from discussing UK racism by asking for comparisons with other countries.

And your claim you haven't had your question answered means you must be right is a childish strawman.


I am quite happy to have a grown up discussion with you about racism, but you need to stop your silly logical fallacies.
 
Please explain how “I lost” because you can’t/won’t answer a simple question?
 
Do you actually read what you post?
I’m wondering if you are of primary school age.
You can’t seem to manage an adult debate.
 
The report also says: "nothing to see here, move along"

"Overt and outright racism persists in the UK", particularly online, the report found, adding that it remained a "real force" and should be taken "seriously".

But it also said: "Too often 'racism' is the catch-all explanation, and can be simply implicitly accepted rather than explicitly examined.
 
Please explain how “I lost” because you can’t/won’t answer a simple question?
You asked an irrelevant question. It's pointless asking for comparisons for several reasons. No such comparative study has ever been undertaken. Therefore, any findings are not available.
Any opinions presented are purely opinions of individuals, and would be controversial, and unprovable. You would refuse to accept any opinions, and you well know that.
These opinions can be refuted, discussed, argued over, all to no avail.
That is why sensible people refuse to engage in your pointless exercise.

The Commission was about UK. The conclusion of the Commission is hugely controversial. The conclusion of the Commission suggested that UK was a role model to follow. In the opinions of distinguished people and organisations, a failing model should not be used as a paradigm. And in the experiences and conclusions of other Inquiries, the UK is a failing model for Equality.

As presented before, Dr Sewell held similar opinion about equality in UK eleven years ago. His opinion was well known. He was undoubtedly chosen for his controversial opinion. He was well paid to arrive at the very same conclusion that he held eleven years ago.
With such a controversial person leading the Commission it was always bound to serve those who wished to do nothing, and retain the status quo.
BJ's mantra has always been to do as little as possible, and to do it slowly. Dr Sewell has served BJ well.
 
Bit of a sweeping statement, some black boys don't do well at school, some other black boys do very well at school.
Afro/Caribbean boys don't do as well as white boys at school while Black African boys do better at school than white boys.
Take your pick.
Precisely, but that is the opinion of Dr Sewell. Black boys need more teaching than their white, Asian, Chinese, etc counterparts.

If that is not racist, then I suggest we redefine the definition of racism.
 
Chaired by a Toney Swell https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Sewell
so hardly whitewashed.
His conclusion was a foregone conclusion. He arrived at the same opinion he held eleven years ago. Why do you think he was selected to lead this Commission? Do you think BJ was not aware of Dr Sewell's previous opinion? He was paid to arrive at the same conclusion that he previously held. What a waste of taxpayers' money!
In 2010, Sewell wrote an article in Prospect magazine in which he argued that "much of the supposed evidence of institutional racism is flimsy"​
 
I believe they people of colour refer to other persons of colour whom disagree with their view of institutional racism as uncle Tom's, or coon's, apparently it's ok for them to say these things, like with the word nig ger, ok for them not ok for whites.
There's always one who exploits the opportunity to use racist terminology.
When asked how blasphemy should be discussed in the classroom, Mr Lunat replies: "If you're teaching a class about racism, would you start by using the 'n' word? If you're teaching children about the potential effects of pornography, would you show a pornographic film?
Mr Lunat, who represents the newly formed Batley Parents And Community Partnership
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-leeds-56590417
Evidently some people are incapable of discussing racism without resorting to racially offensive words.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top