The 'vaccine' - will you have it? And why/why not?

What will you do?

  • Yes

    Votes: 37 74.0%
  • No

    Votes: 6 12.0%
  • Not Sure Yet

    Votes: 7 14.0%

  • Total voters
    50
Status
Not open for further replies.
No, it doesn't.

It means Nemesis did not write what you meant and you have had to alter it to what you think it should have been.
 
In my world no one gets away with holding views for which there is no evidence without being criticised. Or ridiculed if the views are bonkers enough.

I am glad no one in your world gets ridiculed.
.
No, it doesn't.

It means Nemesis did not write what you meant and you have had to alter it to what you think it should have been.
It quite clearly does mean how I interpreted it. I only excluded some words to make it simpler for you to grasp the true meaning.
I guess I didn't simplify it sufficiently for you.
Here it is again in more simplified form:

"In my world no one gets away with holding views for which there is no evidence without being criticised. Or ridiculed if the views are bonkers enough"

Get it now?
 
.
Get it now?
No, you cannot just delete whichever words you choose to make it mean something other than what you actually wrote.

I know that's not what you meant to write - but it is what you did write.


You obviously realise that otherwise you wouldn't be trying to wriggle out of it by altering it.
 
No, you cannot just delete whichever words you choose to make it mean something other than what you actually wrote.

I know that's not what you meant to write - but it is what you did write.


You obviously realise that otherwise you wouldn't be trying to wriggle out of it by altering it.
Bobby aka himmy aka captain necrosis aka bingo bongo aka ...., the words twister in action :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 
No, you cannot just delete whichever words you choose to make it mean something other than what you actually wrote.
He didn't.

He deleted words to make what I meant, in the context of what you wrote, easier for you to understand.

But not easy enough - I guess theres a limit to how much simplification can be done,and that limit is still above what you can comprehend.

When you wrote this, i.e. when you made the context one of people being ridiculed

In my world no one gets away with holding views for which there is no evidence without being criticised. Or ridiculed if the views are bonkers enough.

I am glad no one in your world gets ridiculed.

it was 100% correct to condense what I wrote to

"In my world no one gets away with holding views for which there is no evidence without being criticised. Or ridiculed if the views are bonkers enough."

Or

"In my world no one gets away with holding views for which there is no evidence without being criticised. Or ridiculed if the views are bonkers enough."


Or

"In my world no one gets away..... without being..... ridiculed if the views are bonkers enough."
 
A very special thank you to you, jeds. I really enjoyed reading those posts.
It very clearly does indicate one suspicion I've had.
Many usernames*
RNreindeer, dropclanger, redherring, RogueHanger, himmy, have been banned for no other reason than objecting to, confronting and standing up to racism on this forum.
That supports my other assumption, that either the mods and/or admin and/or site owners are fundamentally racist or there is an endemic racist culture in this forum, and anyone who dares to stand up against racism is 'disappeared' to use RNReindeer's words.

STAND UP TO RACISM
https://www.standuptoracism.org.uk/

I wonder what happened to all those other usernames, such as: JBR, Brigadier, Whitespirit66, longdogs, jockscot, et al.
I suspect they're still here under different names, but as they made and make such little impact no-one is bothered about them. :giggle:


* I've put those words in italics 'cos you can bet your bottom dollar that someone will use it in a corrupted form. I did originally write it in its correct grammatic form, with a comma, but I've since altered it to a full stop, capital letter and a new paragraph, so that if anyone does quote it, they'll have to go the extra mile to corrupt it.
 
Bobby aka himmy aka captain necrosis aka bingo bongo aka ...., the words twister in action :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
I especially like this quote from jockscot:
I think the real giveaway is DC always seems to use France as his location. (that or Staffordshire)
So, let me get this straight, bear with me, just one last question, if all the accusations of dishonesty, deceit, impropriety, etc levelled at all these usernames, redherring RNReindeer, et al, is correct, yet he/she does not bother to lie about his/her location?
You would think that if someone is so deceitful, they'd lie about their location, wouldn't you?

And this quote from RNReindeer:
Except that I've not denied anything.
So for all these allegations of dishonesty, RNReindeer, and all the other usernames, do not lie about their location, nor deny being any other username.
I guess the allegations of dishonesty, etc must all be attempts at character assassination, as usual.
 
I especially like this quote from jockscot:

So, let me get this straight, bear with me, just one last question, if all the accusations of dishonesty, deceit, impropriety, etc levelled at all these usernames, redherring RNReindeer, et al, is correct, yet he/she does not bother to lie about his/her location?
You would think that if someone is so deceitful, they'd lie about their location, wouldn't you?

And this quote from RNReindeer:

So for all these allegations of dishonesty, RNReindeer, and all the other usernames, do not lie about their location, nor deny being any other username.
I guess the allegations of dishonesty, etc must all be attempts at character assassination, as usual.
Maybe you're lying about your location as well.
Who knows???
 
Many usernames* RNreindeer, dropclanger, redherring, RogueHanger, himmy, have been banned for no other reason than objecting to, confronting and standing up to racism on this forum.
A racist bigot using many usernames to stand up against racism.....
Like the paedo organising an event against child cruelty....
 
A racist bigot using many usernames to stand up against racism.....
Perhaps you could find one, just one comment by any of those usernames that could be remotely described as racist?

I guess not because many times you've made that allegation, and each time I've challenged you to find an example and each time you've either posted a nonsense example, or not posted anything at all.
So, come on, support your allegation with just one example of a racist comment made by any of those usernames mentioned.
 
He didn't.

He deleted words to make what I meant, in the context of what you wrote, easier for you to understand.

But not easy enough - I guess theres a limit to how much simplification can be done,and that limit is still above what you can comprehend.

When you wrote this, i.e. when you made the context one of people being ridiculed



it was 100% correct to condense what I wrote to

"In my world no one gets away with holding views for which there is no evidence without being criticised. Or ridiculed if the views are bonkers enough."

Or

"In my world no one gets away with holding views for which there is no evidence without being criticised. Or ridiculed if the views are bonkers enough."


Or

"In my world no one gets away..... without being..... ridiculed if the views are bonkers enough."

Ah, I see so your way of showing a mistake was not a mistake is to change what you wrote.

Like "Cardiff is not the capital of Wales" really means "Cardiff is ..... the capital of Wales".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top