Where did you meet your significant other?

"Linda" sounds more girlish

come to think of it, that was the name of "girlfiend" in above diagram

she lives in Buckhurst Hill now
 
JohnD said:
"Linda" sounds more girlish

come to think of it, that was the name of "girlfiend" in above diagram

she lives in Buckhurst Hill now


Westbury Lane by any chance...... Oh no.... she moved years ago
 
Drinks first, then cards.

Or as they say in western saloons...
 
Near enough

I was going to say ..... first, then ....
 
notb665 said:
Hm. Topologically that would appear correct, but I'm concerned at the implication of commonality of space/time. For example, were both "JD" and "Hub" both s****g both "GF" and "she" at the same moment? :shock:

There's also the question of whether or not the arrow indicates the area of anatomical penetration. I admit to being flummoxed by that element of the diagram.

Then again, do the arrows represent vectors, such that the longer arrow is a larger displacement?
 
Softus said:
I'm concerned at the implication of commonality of space/time. For example, were both "JD" and "Hub" both s****g both "GF" and "she" at the same moment? :shock:

I'm pretty sure not. I think would have noticed how many people were there.

The sequence would actually have been:

GF+Hub start
GF+Hub end
Hub+She start
JD+GF start
Hub+She End
JD+GF End
JD+She start
JD+She end
JD+She start
JD+She end
JD+She start
JD+She end
JD+GF start
JD+GF end

of course, you can never be sure if the "end" of one always happens before the "start" of the next.
 
@ Softus: I can tell you liked my diagram. :wink:

Softus said:
notb665 said:
Hm. Topologically that would appear correct, but I'm concerned at the implication of commonality of space/time. For example, were both "JD" and "Hub" both s****g both "GF" and "she" at the same moment? :shock:

Yeah, I thought that my diagram lacked that.

Softus said:
There's also the question of whether or not the arrow indicates the area of anatomical penetration.

Yeah, I did that on purpose.

Softus said:
Then again, do the arrows represent vectors, such that the longer arrow is a larger displacement?

At first I thought you meant, if my diagram did represent a commonality of space/time, the arrows should keep to the same length and girth. Then I realised you may be referring to volumes of fluid. :shock: :lol: How would I know? How would they know? That's far too much detail if I am correct in thinking what you are referring to. Am I?
 
Back
Top