Reasons to get out

Sponsored Links
I've already explained that telephone debacle erupted in 1969, way before Spain or UK were members.
I'm well aware of the fact that it started in 1969, and I'm also well aware of the fact that from Spain signing up to this "European club" in 1986 it was another 20 years before the telephone issue was finally resolved. And that resolution didn't come from the EU.

All I did was mention the telecoms problem in passing after a reference to people cross-border working between Gibraltar and Spain and now you seem to want to try and make out that the EU has - yet again - been responsible for solving a problem and bringing great benefits.
Well perhaps I'll just mention how EU has enormous benefits for UK because it resolved the miners strike in the 70's. It's about as relevant as the Spain/Gibraltar telecom problem. :rolleyes:
 
Sponsored Links
I've looked through this thread a few times and can't see where he said, he thinks you are pro mass immigration. Have I missed it? Serious question.
I've actually looked through this thread a few times too and I cant see it either. In fact, I've read many threads in GD and I've found lots of spontaneity. Must be a trend.

Or perhaps I was just sounding Gasbag out. Maybe I got the impression he thought I was pro-immigration by his remark.

Do keep on reminding us all though Mitch. Good work.(y)
 
You used the expression unwanted foreigners ..you used it. Freudian slip there I think.
What makes you think I'm pro mass immigration?

I've looked through this thread a few times and can't see where he said, he thinks you are pro mass immigration. Have I missed it? Serious question.

Knows nowt makes up all sorts in his head and jumps to unobvious conclusions.
Then when he's caught out he doesn't answer.
 
Then when he's caught out he doesn't answer.
You couldn't catch a cold bud.

Why don't you give it a pop, Gasbag? You know, try writing something classy for a change instead of the usual infant school dross.

A perfect example of the type of hypocrisy I've mentioned.......quoting you above you refer to writing something classy ...is that an example from you of writing something classy ?
If you wish to maintain some kind of credibility you could attempt a rebuttal to the charge of hypocrisy, you accuse me of hiding behind a profile in what way are you not doing the same ? Is your name really noseall ?
You accuse me of been racially prejudiced I point out I was with my ( your expression not mine ) dark faced mates, you were wrong again.
You say I answer himmy all the time despite him been on my ignore list ....give me an example.
You seem to be a hypocritical little clown answer the points I will offer an apology if I'm wrong, you just seem incapable of admitting you're in the wrong.
Even other posters are correcting you now. Two so far.
Your digging yourself in to hole, obviously I know your obsessed with me as you searched my posts going back what two years to find where I'd asked somebody to PM me to try and refute I didn't know how to PM some body ......because you couldn't believe I'd forgotten how ?
Wow you've made me into an object of veneration in your life I'm flattered you're so interested in me.
Now answer the questions.
 
you just seem incapable of admitting you're in the wrong.
Ok, ok I'm wrong. You have some dark faced mates, you are not really a racist and you are cleverer than me.
Satisfied.
Two out of three ain't bad.

Talking of concessions - ain't it time you stopped boring us to death about immigration now?
 
you just seem incapable of admitting you're in the wrong.
Ok, ok I'm wrong. You have some dark faced mates, you are not really a racist and you are cleverer than me.
Satisfied.
Two out of three ain't bad.

Talking of concessions - ain't it time you stopped boring us to death about immigration now?
7
Let's keep it simple, you accused me of having a private profile.
You accuse me of things you do. So what's your real name you accused me of hiding why don't you post in your real name ?
Can you explain to me why that's not hypocritical ?

Boring us to death, it may be boring to you.
The migration issue is threatening the existence of the EU people are drowning in the med, corpses washing up on beaches with crowds of holiday makers. EU nations dealing with the crises as they individually see fit. The rise of far right parties in Germany as a result of Merkels policy. Sweden telling women not to go out at night and becoming the second rape capital of the world. English lorry drivers under attack as they drive to French ports.
Its obviously escaped you that it's called crisis.maybe you should Google the word crisis.

But let's stick to you explaining why your not a hypocrite. I awaiting your reply. Not eagerly I might add. For once maybe it might be a classy response ( to use your terminology).
 
Last edited:
Let's keep it simple,
That's probably best in your case! :LOL:
Can you explain to me why that's not hypocritical ?
How about you pretending your concern is with the EU:
The migration issue is threatening the existence of the EU
:rolleyes:
Your concern has always been about foreigners and immigration. Nothing else, other than gasbag's and F&I's credibility. You're wasting your time with those two issues.

And please don't bore us with the ethnic mix of your mates. So maybe you have some acquaintances, but if your attitude in reality is anything like it shows on here, they're not really your mates. They might be polite to you, they might know your name and you might know theirs, but that's as far as it goes.
 
Let's keep it simple,
That's probably best in your case! :LOL:
Can you explain to me why that's not hypocritical ?
How about you pretending your concern is with the EU:
The migration issue is threatening the existence of the EU
:rolleyes:
Your concern has always been about foreigners and immigration. Nothing else. You're wasting your time with those two issues.

Seems German voters are concerned about immigration.. So at least gasbanni is not alone in his concerns.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-35801991
 
Let's keep it simple,
That's probably best in your case! :LOL:
Can you explain to me why that's not hypocritical ?
How about you pretending your concern is with the EU:
The migration issue is threatening the existence of the EU
:rolleyes:
Your concern has always been about foreigners and immigration. Nothing else. You're wasting your time with those two issues.

Seems German voters are concerned about immigration.. So at least gasbanni is not alone in his concerns.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-35801991
You should have gone to SpecSavers!:rolleyes:
It points out that the pro-immigration Social Democrat and Green premiers of two states - Rhineland Palatinate and Baden Wuerttemberg - gained votes.
The Tageszeitung agrees. Under the front-page headline "85% stay cool", it points out that the "overwhelming majority" have voted for parties that support Ms Merkel's course.
Her Christian Democrats (CDU) lost votes but remained the strongest party in the poor eastern state of Saxony-Anhalt,
So is this a blow to Mrs Merkel's leadership? Not necessarily. It was also a historic victory for the Greens, who support the chancellor's position on refugees.
Remarkably in those states it was the CDU's left-wing opponents who backed Mrs Merkel's refugee policies most consistently - and tonight reaped the rewards for it. These results are proof that Germany is becoming increasingly polarised between voters who passionately support Mrs Merkel's pro-refugee stance and those angered by it.
So certainly the RWR made some progress, just like Ukip/NF and BNP have made minor progress in UK, but it's not enough to upset the apple cart. The majority of the population are reasonable intelligent people who see through the anti-immigrant rhetoric.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top