Be careful who you offend

It may not have been as you aren't having that conversation but your right to do so will be/has been.
No it has not.

'Hate crime' is just a recent re-branding of threatening and abusive behaviour. Tag that with the ubiquitous use of phone video recording and you have a new weapon against venom spitting, haters. Just like in the video someone posted previously.
 
Sponsored Links
No it has not.

'Hate crime' is just a recent re-branding of threatening and abusive behaviour. Tag that with the ubiquitous use of phone video recording and you have a new weapon against venom spitting, haters. Just like in the video someone posted previously.

Paris_Tuileries_Garden_Facepalm_statue.jpg
 
This thread is getting very far from reality.

A hate incident is an obligation on the police to record it for statistical use.

A police officer may arrest on the reasonable suspicion of an indictable offence plus a few other scenarios.

A decision to charge is based on the prosecution threshold assessed by the CPS. A crime, evidence and the public interest along with a reasonable prospect of conviction.

There have been a few cases of police social media teams engaging in public spats with the public only to end up compensating them for breach of the data protection act.
 
Sponsored Links
You will always get your idiots Woods. Make a law idiot proof and nature will make a better idiot.

Da-da!








_100502114_497c28ad-7634-40e3-b03a-fa69648a4c6a.jpg
 
You will always get your idiots Woods. Make a law idiot proof and nature will make a better idiot.

Da-da!








_100502114_497c28ad-7634-40e3-b03a-fa69648a4c6a.jpg

But you still are either not getting it, or are just deliberately gainsaying just for the sake of it.

The bloke posted a video of a dog, uttered a few words (not even at anyone) someone got offended and now the bloke has a criminal record. Not a video of a beheading or child porn, of a dog. Based on someone (no one in particular mind) just some randomer claiming to be offended.

If you can't see anything wrong with that, then its not just that law that is wrong.
 
just some randomer claiming to be offended.
You need to brush up on the law Woods. I bet he did summat daft like post anti-Semitic stuff on you tube mebbe.
I guess the law folks at his trial understood things better than you Woodplops.(y)
 
You need to brush up on the law Woods. I bet he did summat daft like post anti-Semitic stuff on you tube mebbe.
I guess the law folks at his trial understood things better than you Woodplops.(y)

Religion has been the butt of jokes for a long, long time. Some even suggest the idea of religion is based on a myth.

That next, will I be arrested for hate crimes by suggesting Muhammad was part of a fiction? I'd imagine that would grossly offend a Muslim, to cast doubt on their entire religion and way of life.

And before you say it, I don't believe for a second a pug was really serious about gassing the Jews.
 
I think you will find that it was the tattooed fella that was doing the talking.

The mutt thought he was getting a doggie treat.:rolleyes:

So you don't understand what the joke was?

Should I be surprised?

Has it happens, I'm not.
 
Religion has been the butt of jokes for a long, long time. Some even suggest the idea of religion is based on a myth.

That next, will I be arrested for hate crimes by suggesting Muhammad was part of a fiction? I'd imagine that would grossly offend a Muslim, to cast doubt on their entire religion and way of life.
Slick Sammy seamlessly steers the thread into an anti-Mulsim rant.
Wondered what you was getting at.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top