Revoke Article 50 Petition crashed by volume of traffic.

Status
Not open for further replies.
It is not reasonable to make some serious claim somebody is lying when anybody living in the real world can see he said it as a joke

Sadly the joke flew a mile over your head
Oh well - I didn't predict the right person, but the essence was correct.
How long before you or Ian try to claim that it was actually an award-winning joke?
You see where you and all your associates go wrong when trying to wriggle out of something by claiming it was a joke is that jokes have to be funny.

And no matter how many times you disingenuously claim that something patently not funny really was, and that the fault lies with the person reading it and not seeing that it was funny, you can't change reality.

No amount of post-fact evasion will make what Vinty said funny. People could claim that it was every minute for the rest of their lives, and it would still never be true.
 
A lie will quickly become a joke, once the fibber is found out.

Standard liar diversion.
 
Last edited:
No, I'm sure it is, I expect that despite the precautions put in place there are ways to circumvent them. Voter fraud happens.

But you didn't claim that there are some multiple votes in the total. You claimed that all 6M were from one IP address.

View attachment 161865

So I repeat - do you (and Ian H, who thanked you for it) genuinely believe that all those votes came from one IP address? Or are you both liars?

How long before you or Ian try to claim that it was actually an award-winning joke?
It was actually 60 million from 1 IP address but I reduced it to 6million because it sounded more plausible.
 
Some of vinty's posts are "jokes" and some of them are "lies"

None of them are "true"
 
you mean jacob rice-pudd, the politician who voted in favour of something that he said would turn Britain into a slave state?

Not a reliable or trustworthy man.
 
Oh well - I didn't predict the right person, but the essence was correct.
You see where you and all your associates go wrong when trying to wriggle out of something by claiming it was a joke is that jokes have to be funny.

And no matter how many times you disingenuously claim that something patently not funny really was, and that the fault lies with the person reading it and not seeing that it was funny, you can't change reality.

No amount of post-fact evasion will make what Vinty said funny. People could claim that it was every minute for the rest of their lives, and it would still never be true.
I used to believe that clowns had to be funny but after reading your posts I now realise that you don't have to be funny to be a clown.
 
you mean jacob rice-pudd, the politician who voted in favour of something that he said would turn Britain into a slave state?

Not a reliable or trustworthy man.

well his name is on the petition :eek: the buffoon needs to make his mind up

first he votes down the bill twice

than he says he will not abandon the DUP so will vote with them

then he votes for the bill

yep he cannot be trusted
 
I used to believe that clowns had to be funny but after reading your posts I now realise that you don't have to be funny to be a clown.

take any notice of BAS , blokes all ways been a big ead any way and a watsit bag ;):LOL:
 
I haven’t done too bad for myself for an uneducated thicko. Been responsible for my own employment for the last 32 years and I own outright my own business premises. My 'generalisation' is from seeing with my own eyes all my children’s university educated friends (with the exception of one of them) gaining their degrees in feckology and ending up working full time in the same stores that they worked part time in when they were home on leave from uni. Argos, Sainsbury, Next, Boots. Not one of them has a job in any way related to the degree they took. I take it you have a degree? What’s it in and what do you do for a living?
there is no such thing as a thicko
we are all different
we all have our own abilities and can contribute as much as any one else
just because someone doesnt conform to the "standards " that someone chooses to set as a minimum means nothing
when people set standards and tests they are based around there values and abilities which by there nature are flawed as they preclude usually half society who are at least as useful and often more intelligent in there own way as the so called intellectual who set the pointless test
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top