B
Bodd
Say that she is allowed back to fight her case.....
If she looses her case where would she be deport too?
Bye Shammina ...
- Thread starter ^woody^
- Start date
Say that she is allowed back to fight her case.....
If she looses her case where would she be deport too?
- Joined
- 9 May 2020
- Messages
- 7,393
- Reaction score
- 136
- Country
When? Where? Who? Why? How?
- Joined
- 9 May 2020
- Messages
- 7,393
- Reaction score
- 136
- Country
That is a question to be considered further down the line. You can't deny someone their Human Rights for problems that have not yet arisen, or for solutions that you cannot find.
She was born and brought up in UK, she was radicalised in UK. It's a British problem.
Sha has no access to any process to leave the refugee camp. She is a problem that has been foisted on Syria. She is susceptible to further radicalisation in the camp.
B
Bodd
How do you feel about foreign criminals being deported back from thr UK to their country of birth?
- Joined
- 9 May 2020
- Messages
- 7,393
- Reaction score
- 136
- Country
How is this relevant?
It is, and should be decided on a case by case basis, within general parameters and guide lines.
Shamima Begum's case is an individual case. She has been denied a fair hearing. She is not a criminal. Yes, I know the arguments, but if she has not been tried in a court of law, she is not a criminal. Until such times as she is a criminal, your question has no relevance.
Incidentally, she is not the only one to be stripped of her citizenship. There were about 150 people stripped of their citizenship during the years 2015 to 2017.
The government has refused to release details for the years since then.
Last edited:
- Joined
- 9 May 2020
- Messages
- 7,393
- Reaction score
- 136
- Country
- Joined
- 9 May 2020
- Messages
- 7,393
- Reaction score
- 136
- Country
.
D
durhamplumber
It would set a bad legal precedent to allow this loony back in the country.She went off to join Isis to learn mass murder...I am pleased the judges decided my human rights are more important than hers.
D
durhamplumber
The judges disagree.I wonder who is more knowledgeable......?
D
durhamplumber
- Any individual who becomes a member or professes to be a member of a proscribed organisation is committing an offence unless one of the defences in section 11 of the Terrorism Act 2000 applies.
D
durhamplumber
Lifted from the CPS guidance notes..ISIS is a terrorist organisation...Therefore she IS a criminal.Maybe she had a defence under section 11,,but the judges decided,,,NOT.
D
durhamplumber
Decided it would set a v poor precedent about allowing suicide bombing nutcases to live amongst us...Fair enough I Think.
- Joined
- 9 May 2020
- Messages
- 7,393
- Reaction score
- 136
- Country
When was the trial?
Did I miss it?
Did you miss it?
What was the verdict?
What was the charge?
Where was it held?
- Joined
- 9 May 2020
- Messages
- 7,393
- Reaction score
- 136
- Country
Does the Home Secretary decide now, who is and who is not a criminal?
Has UK ditched the basis of law in UK?
Try lifting the press reports of the trial.
That's kind of the point why her lawyers insist she needs to come here for a trial, they know once she is here she cannot be sent back.
She hasn't said she has been raped either, the lawyer is trying that angle to get her back into the UK.
No one has said she can't have a fair trial, she just can't come back to the UK to face the trial in person.
