Fraudster sentenced to jail

You may or may not be a lawyer, but that is from their lawyer.
Mark Williams-Thomas is a PI/Investigative journalist. An MA in criminology does't make him a legal professional. I briefly skimmed the video it seems to have been commissioned by the accused?
 
no amount if wishing will change the fact that Tories VIP was a corrupt scam for their mates to make money
All the greedy grasping Tory scumbags needed to do, was take a load of useless landfill from China and have our government pay to dispose of it over here.
 
The NCA submits there is a realistic possibility that criminal charges against one or more individuals will flow from the investigation.”
Or They’ve had three years and found nothing.
But they are the ones asking for the hearing to be in private so as not to prejudice their chances of a criminal case.
To hide their lack of evidence/lack of a case and general incompetence. That said, the evidence to the hearing should surely be in public, as I think it was in the post office and Greenfell cases.

Seems odd that neither has been arrested and interviewed under caution. All they need is reasonable suspicion of an offence.
The CPS are probably up with telling the NCA to come back with proper evidence.

It’s not a crime to be greedy or to make a lot of money out of the system.
 
Back to the original thread, it must worry a lot of MEPs that she was basically done for faking expenses. That said I admire the French for taking out a fascist politician from a hollocast denying dynasty posing as a reformed far righter.
 
Back to the original thread, it must worry a lot of MEPs that she was basically done for faking expenses. That said I admire the French for taking out a fascist politician from a hollocast denying dynasty posing as a reformed far righter.

Despite what the voters vote for. Big brother knows best.
 
Its called the fifth republic. France is rightly wary of autocracy given its recent past

Jeopardising ones eligibility is optional.

It's worrying to me because it's hard on the heels of the Romanian election result being overturned because of 'interference', ie, some posts on facebook.
As for whatsername, the charge sheet against her doesn't look too bad if you compare it to Donald's.

Look, I'm not best pleased that Labour got in based on a manifesto of lies, but they did and I accept the result, and I'm stuck with them for 4 or 5 years, maybe they'll turn things around maybe not.

Perhaps one day 'we' won't bother with 'legal' ways of deposing any opposition, just chuck em out of a window like Putin does.
 
Trump is right at the bottom of the swamp, so far down all the others are just a speck in the distance above
He is in the swamp up to his neck standing on heads of MEGA supporters
 
As for whatsername, the charge sheet against her doesn't look too bad if you compare it to Donald's.
It was embezzlement and running a scam which fraudulently obtained millions of pounds of euro funding. Do you think the courts just made up the charges, or they didn't but she just deserved a slap on the wrist?
 
As for whatsername, the charge sheet against her doesn't look too bad if you compare it to Donald's.
Donald had $billions and a whole legal, judicual and political machine, fighting in his favour.
I'm not convinced of her guilt either, and maybe the appeals process will remove any doubt.
Bit silly of her to chuck it all away for greed.
 
Back
Top