- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,876
- Reaction score
- 3,063
- Country

Then the analogy is even worse. That's just a coin toss.There was no signage implied. Just two bare doors, either one potentially led to the exit.

Then the analogy is even worse. That's just a coin toss.There was no signage implied. Just two bare doors, either one potentially led to the exit.
One at a time...and still is

I don't Adam and eve it.Your opinion was based on the absence of evidence? OK.
Who is 'he', and what are 'his' claims?
What are the facts that you presented?

You'd like that wouldn't youOne at a time...

We don't, you keep using the word assigning which I disagree with. It is simply a record of the sex of the baby.So why do we insist on assigning a sex at birth?

So the sex of a baby at birth shouldn't be recorded?It was an analogy to show that a binary choice (within strict time limits) is flawed.

Of course it should otherwise how do we know the population of any given country or the worldSo the sex of a baby at birth shouldn't be recorded?

I'm happy with recorded.The choice means that it is assigned, allocated, designated, or whatever word you wish to use.
That's a different argument.Never any bad or incorrect choices?

16?In some instances it might be better to wait until the child has an input.

Agreed, when you leaving. then?Trolls and liars are never of benefit to any forum.

Dopes that mean, at birth, the options would be boy, girl, or don't know?If the choice is purely binary, and the available options do not fit, other options are needed.


TBD, some third option, further consideration

What part of I will not give dates do you not understand? take my 5 years or 4 years or 10 years as innacurate and don't let the dates get you too worked up. You must be tearing your hair out working on my dates.Have a look at the dates he posted them dummy. Time doesn't run backwards.![]()