There was only one Pete01.
Speaking of people going missing, what about Odds? His avatar has changed and he hasn't posted for days. Is it usual for him to disappear?
Last edited:
There was only one Pete01.
some people
Why do you seem to want to flatly refuse to accept that...
Speaking of people going missing, what about Odds? His avatar has changed and he hasn't posted for days. Is it usual for him to disappear?
Last I saw of him was when I posted 'Allahu Akbar' after one of his lengthy pro Hamas diatribes, he responded with some abuse and haven't seen him since.
No sense of humour those Arabs.
But you are saying that, if you refuse to accept that if a baby is not intersex (see other posts) it must be M or F.I'm not saying that there is a spectrum.

If you have concerns like that, wouldn't the simplest, and most secure thing to have simply been not to mention that you were ever in the forces?None of your concern or your business, I have reasons for not giving dates out as I am concerned with keeping my identity as it needs to be. Secure. You on the other hand face no danger as a handyman.
Sorry mate but your identity as an ex forces highways electrician from the East Midlands could fairly easily be established if necessary. There’s nothing about sharing your service dates that will identify you or bring you into disrepute or dishonour. Quite the opposite. Kill the debate.None of your concern or your business, I have reasons for not giving dates out as I am concerned with keeping my identity as it needs to be. Secure. You on the other hand face no danger as a handyman.

Well, if potentially needing to use drugs and surgery to change a person's hormones and physical characteristics to make them fit into a category defined by hormones and physical appearance doesn't confirm to you that it isn't a simple binary system, nothing will.

Those last 3 are included in the category of DSDs which seems to be of great significance to MNW67Yes a percentage of babies don't fall into one of the two categories and they are termed intersex. Some people try to inflate the number.
PubMed says
"Anne Fausto-Sterling s suggestion that the prevalence of intersex might be as high as 1.7% has attracted wide attention in both the scholarly press and the popular media. Many reviewers are not aware that this figure includes conditions which most clinicians do not recognize as intersex, such as Klinefelter syndrome, Turner syndrome, and late-onset adrenal hyperplasia.
So nearly 24,000 births last year, world-wide.If the term intersex is to retain any meaning, the term should be restricted to those conditions in which chromosomal sex is inconsistent with phenotypic sex, or in which the phenotype is not classifiable as either male or female. Applying this more precise definition, the true prevalence of intersex is seen to be about 0.018%, almost 100 times lower than Fausto-Sterling s estimate of 1.7%."
About 1 in 5000. Not irrelevant but small.
Yes yes yes yes yes we ALL know it exists.
It's unfortunate for those involved but in society generally it's not a problem.
Why troll on about it?

Nah mate. A lot can be established by dates and records. It is not something I am not willing to divulge. There is no debate.Sorry mate but your identity as an ex forces highways electrician from the East Midlands could fairly easily be established if necessary. There’s nothing about sharing your service dates that will identify you or bring you into disrepute or dishonour. Quite the opposite. Kill the debate.
IMO there wouldn’t be too much of a problem with a man identifying as a woman being allowed into women’s spaces if he genuinely wants to live as a woman and doesn’t cause any harm. The problem is with men doing it falsely, eg criminals who do it to get into a women’s prison as they assume it will be an easier gig, or getting into other women’s spaces for sexual reasons. To prevent that would justify quite a lot of inconvenience for genuine transsexuals. They know who to blame.IIRC the equality act says trans people are to be treated as the gender they transition to for all purposes, but doesn’t say that their biological sex changes, so a lot of people confused by politicians trying to be all things to all people

I think you might be using a different definition of "spectrum" to me.But you are saying that, if you refuse to accept that if a baby is not intersex (see other posts) it must be M or F.

What I don't like are haters and bigots trying to justify their hostility to transgender people on the basis that there is a biological fact that there are only 2 sexes.And yet you don't like the sex of all the others being recorded, as a biological fact, which it is.
So despite all that you have ever read or heard, you still think that some people are trying to declare themselves to be a different sex.Just in case, at some future date, they decide they want to call themselves a kitten, or a kangaroo, or a person of a sex they do not have.