Woman and Sex, means biological sex.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm not going to say something untrue for the sake of this discussion,

This discussion is already rotten with people saying things which aren't true.



So here we are, 43 pages in, and you still aren't paying enough attention to have spotted that the thread was started on the basis of there being a legal decision that there are only 2 sexes and how that (in transphobic bigotland) means we (i.e. the society which the transphobic bigots want to wish into existence) can get on with dismissing trans people as either non-existent or totally unimportant.

Medical conditions, no matter how rare, show that the court's decision was scientifically flawed.



Well we know that it isn't "just the way it is". Not always.
Mostly. It is.
 
Mistakes happen, you seem to be saying it is intentional. I don't believe that is the case at all
By definition a mistake cannot be intentional. If actions are intentional, but it later transpires that they were mistaken that doesn't mean that the people taking the actions intended to get t wrong.

But it does show that they made a choice of which direction to take someone, and, no matter how well-intentioned, made the wrong choice.
 
You can't hear anything at all.
Some things are beyond your comprehension, so don't worry.
I said "some things", I meant "most things"...
I can hear you saying that prison staff and related are afraid to lose their job for truthfully saying that a prisoner is dangerous.

I can hear you saying that it's stupid to describe members of a group which says things like "We’re passionate about bringing the love, justice, truth, freedom and hope of Jesus Christ to the heart of society. And we’re building a movement of Christians who share that passion" as Christians.

But you are right that it is beyond my comprehension why you would say things which are so obviously wrong.
 
Tom's posts all deleted but then reinstated with a name change. I've not seen that before.
He’s probably a mod, the new bloke hasn’t stopped posting either…

Always in the same style!
 
He’s probably a mod, the new bloke hasn’t stopped posting either…

Always in the same style!
Sorry if you don't agree with my beliefs, but they are mine, and I'm entitled to them, and to express them. As you are yours.

As for the frequency of my posts, I'm off work at the moment recuperating. So I'm entertaining myself.
Sorry if that offends you. I try not to be offensive.
 
But is it still irrelevant conflation.
Conflation?
Who is conflating what?

Highwayman said never at one point and then conceded mostly at another point. The two arguments are irreconcilable.

If it's never, then there are no exceptions.
If it's mostly, then there are exceptions. There is no conflation, and there is no reconciliation.
 
Conflation?
Who is conflating what?

Highwayman said never at one point and then conceded mostly at another point. The two arguments are irreconcilable.

If it's never, then there are no exceptions.
If it's mostly, then there are exceptions. There is no conflation, and there is no reconciliation.

Can we start with the basics, because I am still learning about this stuff.

My understanding is that there are only two genetic sexes. Even the exceptions you talk about i.e. those people with DSDs, are still genetically either male or female. There is no third genetic sex. Is that what you believe as well?
 
But it does show that they made a choice of which direction to take someone
No, they followed the correct path at the time. They weren't saying "shall we make it a boy, or shall we make it a girl". they were correcting "conditions" in an already determined sex.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top