Katie Hopkins

[noseall]

This part. Is two and a half months rapid in such cases.

Yep. One letter then retraction

Happy squirming.

 

[motorbiking]

Are you suggesting the offer wasn't retracted after one letter?

 

[noseall]

Are you suggesting the offer wasn't retracted after one letter?

I'm not suggesting anything other than this....

The demand for an apology was not sincere.

Lies.

Monroe’s offer was not sincere and rapidly retracted

More lies

And that the offer was not rescinded, retraced or withdrawn after 38 minutes. That was also a big billy bullshít moment for you and this little montage says it all..

Waffling but on board here I see....

Imagine it was you and I and our identities were known. Assume you defame me and I demand an apology and donation to the Reform Party of £5k. It is intended to humiliate you, as it’s well known that you cannot stand their cause. I then crow about how much fun I’m going to have owning you.

Plenty of made-up waffle but no back tracking to para' 17 yet..

There we go, back to being dumb again. If you read 19 - 21 in the judgement. You will see the letter before action timing, the offer and when it was withdrawn.

An offer of settlement that is intended to humiliate and seek revenge, is not an offer in good faith intended to settle the complaint.

Yep, still squirming but on board and no mention of para' 17 yet...

Read 19-21.

And then this happens....

WRONG

you've literally just made up your own version. Here is the correct version again:

(1) At 7.20pm Ms Hopkins posted the first tweet of which Ms Monroe complains (“The First Tweet”). It was in these words: “@MsJackMonroe scrawled on any memorials recently? Vandalised the memory of those who fought for your freedom. Grandma got any more medals?”
(2) At 7.33pm Ms Monroe tweeted in these terms: “I have NEVER ‘scrawled on a memorial’. Brother in the RAF. Dad was a Para in the Falklands. You’re a piece of s**t.” (With a screenshot to the First Tweet)
(3) Ms Monroe tweeted again at 7.36pm: “I’m asking you nicely to please delete this lie Katie, and if I have to ask again it will be through my lawyer.” (With a link to the First Tweet)
(4) At 8.14pm Ms Monroe tweeted again, this time using Ms Hopkins’ Twitter handle: “Dear @KTHopkins, public apology +£5k to migrant rescue & I won’t sue. It’ll be cheaper for you and v. satisfying for me.”
(6) At 9.47pm Ms Hopkins posted the second tweet of which Ms Monroe complains (“the Second Tweet”). It was in these terms:“Can someone explain to me - in 10 words or less - the difference between irritant @PennyRed and social anthrax @jack Monroe.”
(7) At some point that evening, I infer about this time, Ms Hopkins blocked Ms Monroe. That prevented Ms Monroe from communicating with her via Twitter.
(8) Later on 18 May 2015 the Claimant published the following on Twitter: “BA_DA_BOOM! It lies! It smears! It’s wrong! It panics! It blocks! It’s @KTHopkins everyone!” (With six pictures of a chicken)
(9) At 22:30 on 18 May 2015 the Claimant published the following on Twitter: “Gin o clock. Cheers. God isn’t it good sweet justice when a poisonous bully gets shown up for what it is and runs runs runs away.”

This is from the judgement not your made up version.

Your version corrected below:

Tweet 1: Hopkins to Monroe
Tweet 2: Monroe reply to Hopkins saying no she had not abd would not deface memorials
Tweet 2.1: Monroe reply to Hopkins demanding an apology
"Tweet 4": Monroe to Hopkins asking for money to charity.
"Tweet 3": Hopkins to Monroe: another poisonous tweet

It makes a difference.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Ahh, I can see where you went down the MBK made up bullshít rabbit hole, right here.

Tweet 2.1 does not demand an apology, and there is no offer. She asks her to take down a tweet is all. And from thereafter, the MBK bullshít flows unabated.

 

[noseall]

Are you suggesting the offer wasn't retracted after one letter?

Are you saying your own previous posts i.e.
#239
#241
#243

..are all lies?

Are you suggesting that when you said in post #303 that Monroe demanded an apology in her 7:36 pm tweet, that you didn't just make it up?

 

[noseall]

This part. Is two and a half months rapid in such cases.

Yep. One letter then retraction

 

[motorbiking]

post 303 had the references and was corrected. You on the other hand haven't posted anything correct in this entire thread.

 

[noseall]

post 303 had the references and was corrected.

You corrected your mistake? Where? You said JM demanded an apology. She did not. She asked KH to take down a tweet.

And you had already pointed towards para' 19, 20, 21 previously in reference to the offer i.e....

Are you saying your own previous posts...
#239
#241
#243

..are all lies?

Nowhere in those paragraphs 19, 20, 21 does JM rapidly remove her offer and certainly not after 38 minutes.

The demand for an apology was not sincere.

Lies.

Monroe’s offer was not sincere and rapidly retracted

More lies

 

[Deleted member 323070]

She lost her house Monroe lost more, it seems, both at their own hands.

Please explain.

Over 24 hours now and still no explanation offered.
I think it's safe to assume you were making unsubstantiated and unsupportable claim.

 

[fillyboy]

Monroe certainly leads an interesting life.

Jack Monroe Investigation Main

This is the HTML version of Katie Roche's investigation into Jack Monroe

katieroche.net

Is Jack Monroe a Liar? Bootstrap Cook Faces Scrutiny

Any UK person that has lived through Lockdown and used Twitter knows who Jack Monroe is. Maybe she's most famously

sundaywoman.com

Exit Through The Grift Shop. More on the Jack Monroe case.

The food writer and internet personality Jack Monroe is a bit of a ‘Marmite’ character. Some people adore her and believe that she is an authentic example of a struggling working…

www.fahrenheit211.net

Jack Monroe | Mumsnet

Jack has resurfaced on Twitter, changed her user name and has said that a hacker has been deleting some of her tweets while she's been having a p...

www.mumsnet.com

https://www.reddit.com/r/unitedkingdom/comments/wtyopq/jack_monroe_saint_or_scammer

 

[noseall]

Monroe certainly leads an interesting life

No one would have heard of her until Hopkins vile rant.She certainly wouldn't be on the radar of diynot's RWR.

Over 24 hours now and still no explanation offered.
I think it's safe to assume you were making unsubstantiated and unsupportable claim.

I think he means mentally (probably). After all, the humiliation for KH, being publicly ridiculed by a feminist lesbian, must have been excruciating.

 

[Deleted member 323070]

I think he means mentally (probably). After all, the humiliation for KH, being publicly ridiculed by a feminist lesbian, must have been excruciating.

No one would have heard of until Hopkins vile rant.

It has given her a higher profile, for sure.
I'm not convinced that any mental anguish would have occurred from that.
If she has been the object of online abuse, I suspect she will have learnt to deal with that.

Perhaps mbk will explain, or perhaps not.

 

[noseall]

Perhaps mbk will explain, or perhaps not.

I doubt liar MBK will revisit this thread.

 

[Mottie]

No one would have heard of her until Hopkins vile rant.

I’ve heard of her before. She's been on Saturday kitchen a few times. The last time I remember her being on there she tried a bit of crude double entendre with Matt Tebbut. It stopped him in his tracks. I’ve not seen her on there since. Comes from Southend I think. Didn’t know she was a Lezza at the time though.

 

[Brigadier]

Comes from Southend I think

Didn’t know she was a Lezza at the time though

Is that the term for someone from Southend?

 

[Deleted member 323070]

I doubt liar MBK will revisit this thread.

Maybe he's busy with his Bar examination.

"Eshcuse me,,,, Mrs barman, shorry, woman. ....Can we....... hase a sh....sh....pint of that wifesh.....beater beer, pleashe? Shorrrrry, 'm a bit tipsshhhy."